|

home
journals back

ISSN 1357-5279
VOLUME 11 NUMBER 2
APRIL 2005
On this page you can view the full text
of the
Foreword
Contents and Abstracts
99 Foreword
Peter Clough & Cathy
Nutbrown
103
Inclusion in the Early
Years: From Rhetoric to Reality
Frances Ross-Watt
Inclusion is one of five National Priorities identified by the
Scottish Executive Education Department. As a consequence, teachers
throughout Scotland are presently confronting the progression from
integration to inclusion, along with the many changes that brings.
This paper recounts the first stage of an on-going case study into
the experiences of Heather, a girl with Spina Bifida, who requires
additional support to meet her special educational needs. It charts
her progress through nursery, transition to primary one and
advancement through primary one to the end of the year. The setting
is a mainstream primary school, one that prior research has
identified as embodying good inclusive practice.
By adopting the case study approach, the paper aids our
appreciation of the various issues, concerns and difficulties facing
mainstream staff in early years education, as they endeavour to
respond to the diverse needs of an increasing population of learners
with Special Educational Needs. We are given the opportunity of
examining the robustness of the inclusive procedures and practices
within the school. We also explore the multidisciplinary dimension
through studying the contributions of the psychologist, occupational
therapist, classroom assistant even the janitor-as each plays
his/her part in the education and development of this little girl.
In this way, the paper allows us to view the practice of inclusion
from the perspective of headteacher, class teachers, parent and
classroom assistant. Finally, and most importantly, we see the
effect and reality of the policy through the eyes of the child
herself.
119
Close Encounters: Issues in Pre-school Parental Involvement in Northern
Ireland
Dorothy J. McMillan
Current discourse in educare acknowledges the partnership between
parents and practitioners. But is the partnership a reality, and
exactly what does the term mean to those who use it? The increased
interest in the relationship between home and school is one of the
most positive educational developments of the past decade. Today, at
all levels of education, there is overwhelming agreement that
parents have a valuable role to play in the education of their
children. Parental involvement is promoted at government level and
the prevalent culture of rights encourages parents to exercise their
rights in the field of education. Early years educators have long
recognised the importance of strong home-school links, since the
pre-school setting forms a "bridge" for both child and family to
cross between home and school. The high level of attendance at
nursery school parents' meetings in Northern Ireland bears this out;
but involvement in special occasions does not necessarily constitute
partnership. Do parents and providers speak the same language with
regard to communication, partnership and involvement?
135
Exploring Management Practices in Child Care Centres in Australia,
Queensland from a Social Systems Framework
Hanna Nupponen
The focus of this
research was on the nature and characteristics of effective
leadership and management practices in centre-based child care. This
paper is part of a larger doctoral study with a focus on management
within child care centres. Eight directors were interviewed in south
east Queensland, Australia using a case study methodology. There has
been minimal Australian research focused on the management aspects
of directors' work in centre-based child care to date. The
conceptual framework adopted in this study views management from a
Social Systems Model. Central to a Social Systems framework is the
notion that early childhood centres do not exist in isolation;
rather, management in these settings is embedded in a broader social
context. A Social Systems Model has received little attention in
contemporary research on child care in Australia, and this study
aims to build a framework for future studies in this area. The aim
was to produce an understanding of directors' work; perceptions of
their role as managers in the centre; their experiences; and the
nature of management within the context of the child care field in a
complex social, political and economic climate.
161
Giving Voice to the Swedish Pre-school Child: Inclusion through
Educational Process Reflection
Kerstin Bygdeson-Larsson
Educational Process Reflection (EPR) has been introduced in Swedish
pre-school practice and brought about an expanded focus in
educational work, concerning democratic values and promotion of
health. The study used EPR to facilitate professional development,
by teachers' collective reflection of narratives and observations of
interaction and play processes. EPR brought about a shift of the
teachers' perception of children, and enhanced intersubjectivity in
communication. This implies a more healthy and democratic
environment for the children. The theoretical lens for the study
includes activity theory and Winnicott's concept of potential space.
179
Inclusion, Impact and Need: Young Children with a Visual Impairment
Colette Gray
From preschool to tertiary level, the past decade has witnessed a
growing impetus for the inclusion of children with special needs and
disabilities in mainstream education. Yet evidence on the needs of
children with visual impairments (VI) remains scant. This paper
seeks to inform the debate by presenting findings from research
designed to explore the perceptions and experiences of parents,
young people with VI and health and early years professionals
working in the preschool sector. The findings reveal a significant
increase in the incidence of VI in children attending early years
settings. Despite their commitment to the ideals underpinning
inclusive education, interviewees are concerned with the lack of
awareness training available for staff working with the VI.
Criticism is also levelled at specialist schools in Northern
Ireland, for failing to provide a full educational experience for
children and young people, aged from three to 18, with VI.
191
The FACE YOUR FEAR Club: Therapeutic Group Work with Young Children as a
Response to Community Trauma in Northern Ireland
David Stewart & Kirsten Thomson
The translation of research into practice in social care
is long on theory and short on practical examples. We describe a pilot
project, which identified an important practice issue — the promotion of
positive attachment in early infancy -— explored the evidence base,
summarised the findings, and devised an implementation process. The site
of the project was a Barnardo’s service in Belfast, which provides
assistance to young women with infant children in a residential setting,
where there are serious concerns about the capacity of the women to
provide unassisted care. The paper is illustrated with extracts from the
documentation that drove the process.
211
Talking about Quality: Report of a Consultation Process on Quality in
Early Childhood Care and Education in Ireland
Maresa Duignan
The development
of a National Framework for Quality in early childhood care and
education in Ireland is the main focus of the work of the Centre for
Early Childhood Development and Education. A central element of the
brief for this groundbreaking initiative is that it must have
relevance for all settings where children aged birth to six are
present. This paper discusses a key step in meeting this challenge.
It outlines a process of national consultation to establish baseline
perceptions among all stakeholders in relation to the core elements
of the framework (defining, assessing and supporting quality). It
discusses the rationale for the consultation that is premised upon a
belief that the best interests of the child can only be served by
policy and practice that has been informed by the consensus arising
from the interface of the multiple perspectives that characterise
early childhood care and education in Ireland. The findings,
distilled from thematic analysis of the data collected from the
series of six consultations in six locations, are presented and
their implications for the development of a National Framework for
Quality discussed.
231
The Effect of
Regulation on the Quality of Early Childhood Services in Ireland
Mary O'Kane
The first
legislative control over early education services in Ireland came
into place in 1996, in the form of the Child Care (Pre-School
Services) Regulations' (Department of Health, 1996). The research
hypothesis of this study was that the implementation of the
Regulations would have had an impact on quality of early childhood
care and education (ECCE) services in Ireland. The specific
objectives of the study were: to examine a sample of pre-schools to
investigate both structural and process aspects of quality; to
examine the possible relationship between these elements of quality;
and to interview both Supervisors of these pre-schools and a small
sample of Pre-school Officers to investigate their attitudes towards
the Regulations. It was acknowledged at the outset that related
factors, such as increased level of investment and improved levels
of training, may have affected quality of provision.
The baseline data used for the purposes of this study were gathered
in 1994/1995 during Phase II of the IEA2 Preprimary
Project (IEA/PPP). This was a large crossnational study that
investigated the quality of care and education that children from
various countries received at four years of age. Full details of the
Irish aspect of Phase II can be found in
A Window on Early
Education in Ireland: the First National Report of the IEA
Preprimary Project (Haves, O'Flaherty, & Kernan, 1997). Use of
these data allowed comparison of both structural and process
elements in ECCE provision before the implementation of the
Regulations, and six years after their implementation in 2002.
The methodology of the present study involved revisiting a subsample
of the original IEA/PPP national sample, undertaking structured
observations and administering questionnaires to teachers and
supervisors. A number of key issues emerged from the research.
First, improvements were found in the quality of the pre-school
provision in the present study as compared with that of the original
study, although it is not clear the extent to which these
improvements relate directly to the Regulations. The results also
suggest that the need for training is becoming more widely accepted
in the sector in
Ireland. As predicted, increased awareness of training for ECCE
professionals, and increased levels of funding appear also to have
had an effect on quality. A third issue emerging from this study was
the changing role of the pre-school teacher. The findings of this
study also provided information regarding the nature of the
relationship between regulation and quality provision. Related to
this was the interaction between structural and process variables in
quality ECCE provision. Full details of the study can be found in
O'Kane (2004a).
This paper concentrates on how the findings relate to two of the
themes identified: interaction between structural and process
aspects of quality, and training.
253 Constructions of
Childhood in Ireland in the Twentieth Century: A View from the Primary
School Curriculum 1900-1999
Thomas Walsh
Our concept of
childhood is context-linked and time-specific. This paper traces the
evolution of our conceptualisation of childhood in Ireland, focusing
particularly on children aged four to six years of age, from 1900 to
the present day. In the course of the past century, this perception
has altered greatly in light of advancements in society's
understanding of children. There has been a gradual transformation
in the position of children in society, and the rights and interests
of children now receive unprecedented attention in the public
domain.
These changes have been influenced, and indeed catalysed, by
dramatic social, economic, familial, democratic, religious, cultural
and political changes throughout the twentieth century. While there
are a number of sources outlining the position of children in
society, this paper focuses on documentation from the education
system, particularly the content of successive primary school
curricula in Ireland. Analysis of documentation provides an insight
into society's view and value of children in Ireland in the
twentieth century. This is traced in three distinct phases; the
curriculum in the period preindependence (1900-1922); the programme
adopted upon independence and implemented for close to 50 years
(1922-1971); and the revisions that took place and were adopted in
the curriculum (1971-1999).
253
Constructions of
Childhood in Ireland in the Twentieth Century: A View from the Primary
School Curriculum 1900-1999
Thomas Walsh
DHSSPS Contribution
275
An Updated Guide to
Current Legislation and Associated Guidance for Family and Child Care
Practitioners
Michael Williamson
283
Childcare Policy
Directorate DHSSPS
285
Protection of Children
and Vulnerable Adults (NI) Order 2003
___________
Foreword
Inclusion and Development in the Early Years: Making Inclusion
Conventional?
Human rights are
inscribed in the hearts of people; they were there long before
lawmakers drafted their first proclamation. (Mary Robinson, former
United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights)
It
is a particular pleasure to contribute to this special edition of
Child Care in Practice as its focus on inclusive early education and
care highlights global as well as specifically local concerns and
interests. This collection of papers reaches into different parts of the
globe in an attempt to identify barriers to inclusion, and practices
which promote equality through diversity. The papers range from a
consideration of specific strategies focusing on individual children
(Ross-Watt, Bygdeson-Larsson) to exploration of nationwide strategies to
promote high-quality provision that enables the inclusion of all young
children in preschool provision (Duignan, O'Kane, Walsh). This
collection illustrates the fundamental rightness of the inclusive
project and simultaneously demonstrates the complexity of practices
which develop such agenda. As such it offers fuel to those who continue
to pursue the goal of treating all young children as having
rights to citizenship in their communities.
For, as Robinson has it, Human Rights are "inscribed in the hearts of
people"; and, they are also inscribed, more specifically for children,
in the Convention on the Rights of the Child (United Nations
[UN], 1989); this makes clear the basic human rights that children
everywhere have: the right to survival; to develop to the fullest; to
protection from harmful influences, abuse and exploitation; and to
participate fully in family, cultural and social life. It is in short-a
"Convention for Inclusion" of all children in all matters
that concern them. It is a convention for dignity and respect for all
children whatever their country of origin, regardless of their
abilities, without reference to their family's economic status, or their
religion or other differences that distinguish or define them.
The UN Convention may well be the means by which, internationally, we
become able-in the long term to make inclusion conventional rather than
exceptional. Although the Convention is addressed to signatory
countries, we would argue that it effectively charges every adult
with a responsibility to play a part in the upbringing of the youngest
of our citizens; that is, all adults, be they policy-makers,
practitioners from a wide range of professions, parents, but-no
less-those other members of communities (shop keepers, bus drivers,
postal workers, etc.), men and women who-although they may not
necessarily have a specific role in relation to work with or for
children have a none the less crucial part to play ensuring the
well-being of young children.
In seeking to protect children's rights by setting standards in health
care, education and legal, civil and social services, the Convention
stresses the principle of nondiscriminatory practices. The onus is on
countries to identify the most vulnerable and disadvantaged children and
develop policies and practices so that the rights of those children are
afforded to them. It is this all-embracing concept of rights for all
children that leads us to suggest that seeking inclusive practices
in the early years is a direct response to the UN Convention; indeed,
early childhood education at its best is inclusive, comprehensive
education that meets the needs of all children and aims to help each one
of them fulfil their own unique potential (Nutbrown, 1998, p. 167).
Young children can only be truly included if their educators understand
their needs, and how to meet such needs through practices which aspire
to excellence. For inclusion is about much more than location it is more
than simply "being" in a setting it is about making sure that young
children and their families are offered opportunity fully to participate
in events and developments. And this is, alas, easier said than done.
Despite the increasingly shared political agenda for social inclusion,
there remain barriers to inclusion which have yet to be overcome. Four
key themes - which cross geographical and cultural borders - seem to us
to dominate the literature.
-
There is an evident
climate of policy change towards inclusion across Europe (and)
-
A multinational
commitment towards (and inclusive response to) education of children
with learning difficulties has been established (but)
-
A commonality of
concern exists about the education of children with emotional and
behavioural difficulties and
-
Inclusive
ideologies continue to be discussed and promoted whilst, at the same
time, exclusive practices continue. (Nutbrown & Clough, 2004, p.
306)
In
two recent studies of educators' attitudes to inclusion, we found that
although many practitioners espoused a pro-inclusive policy rhetoric, in
reality they maintained reservations based on: the needs of the children
they were seeking to include; the responses of parents; their own level
of professional knowledge, and the level and quality of support they
were offered to make inclusion of children with particular needs a
reality (Clough & Nutbrown, 2004; Nutbrown & Clough, 2004).
Participants from a range of settings and policy contexts generally
supported inclusion but with important reservations; the "Yes-but . .
." factor that we identified highlights the mismatch between policy
and practical realities-between the willingness to include all children,
in principle, and the ability to cater appropriately for the diverse and
sometimes demanding needs of young children. For example, two of the
early years practitioners we interviewed commented:
[It] ... depends on the degree of the condition the children
have. A child who has mobility problems could not pose any
insurmountable problems, but a child with severe autism would be too
disruptive and would affect the learning process for the rest of the
children.
Children should be included, provided that there is adequate
teaching support available to enable all class members to receive equal
attention during lessons. It (inclusion) should promote tolerance
in children without disability and enhance learning in those with a
disability.
However important are the views of practitioners, Kilpatrick and Hunter
(2005) remind us-in their review of inclusive education principles and
practices in Northern Ireland that various "layers" of inclusion must be
peeled back to truly understand inclusion from a child's viewpoint. They
argue that only when children's perspectives are understood, can an
education system be truly inclusive.
Perhaps some aspects of inclusion can be summed up in this comment from
a teacher working in Northern Ireland who, reflecting on views of
childhood said:
Little children are so at risk aren't
they? It's such a responsibility to try to protect them from all
sorts of horrors, we have to try to do that for all of them in the
early years-Special Needs or not. (Clough & Nutbrown, 2004, p. 203)
This comment embodies the spirit and programme of the UN Convention
on the Rights of the Child to protect young children, to be
responsible providers of early education, and to provide what they need
and are entitled to -whatever their specific needs. Such aims also
underpin the purpose of this edition of Child Care in Practice.
"Protection" can take many forms and, as Stewart and Thomson remind us,
"facing fear" and recognising (and seeking to heal) the real trauma that
some children in Northern Ireland have suffered is an essential part of
enabling them to participate in the education that is rightly theirs-to
be able to go to school without fear is a right that the UN Convention
exists to uphold-yet the practicalities of addressing such rights in the
face of political conflicts create a challenge for practitioners that
must be met with integrity and deep knowledge of the context in which
such trauma arises.
This collection of papers offers examples of research and practice,
commentary on policy and vision for future developments in inclusive and
comprehensive early education. It demonstrates some ways in which early
education can truly respect young children and strive to afford every
child equality of opportunity be they children with specific learning
difficulties (Gray) or those whose families exist on the "margins" of
the communities in which they live. We can see how the ways in which
provision and systems are managed can make a difference to the quality
of provision and the experiences offered to each family (Nupponen), and
how the crucial relationships with parents need to be nurtured so that
parents do not simply "attend events" but experience positive and
fundamental "involvement" in their children's early years settings
(McMillan). All young children have the right to responsive, respectful
education, not just those children who are easy to work with, obliging,
endearing, clean, pretty, articulate, capable. Indeed, inclusive early
childhood education and care means respecting children for who they are,
respecting their language, their culture, their history, their family,
their abilities, their needs, their name, their ways and their very
essence.
___
|