|

home
journals this
journal 
ISSN 0840-982X
VOLUME 13 NUMBER 2
In this
issue
Well, now, I'd
like to tell you that this is one of those issues that bring tears
of pride to an editor's eyes, but I guess that would be going a
little too far. While all the issues of the Journal contain
helpful, quality articles, every once in a while we manage to pull
together an issue that speaks directly to the heart — of child
and youth care, that is. This is one of those issues. The
materials in this issue address the two central issues of our
field: self and relationship.
We open this issue with a letter. In Making a Reflective
Relationship-Based Decision: A Letter, Sydney Samakosky tells
the story of being asked, by a young man in the care of his
organization, to spend the day fishing. The story would be
wonderful if only because the very idea of being asked to go
fishing seems to us to be central to good youth care, but even
more interesting is how Sydney shares his thinking with us about
how to respond to the request.
Next, we welcome
back to the Journal's pages an old friend and humoristic
teacher, Karl Gompf. In his It's My Kind of Journal: A Love
Relationship, Karl talks a little about what the Journal of
Child and Youth Care has meant to him in terms of his own
development and why he continues to be a loyal supporter. After
all, he says, where else could you find a journal that lets
authors say "pissed-off"? Ah well, to each his own, and
Karl is clearly one of ours.
We also welcome back the
warm "Doctor of Wonderland," Penny Parry. In Relationships:
Thoughts on Their Origin and Their Power, Penny, to whom
relationship is central to being, shares some of her personal
experiences in relationship formation and development. Her
presence, even in writing, allows you to enter into a relationship
with her through the written word.
In Youth Who Attempt
Suicide: Exploring Their Experience of Relationship, Carol
Stuart offers us an infrequent look into the inner experiences and
experiencing of some troubled young people. Through a narrative
research approach she allows the youth's voices to be heard and in
doing so, Carol demonstrates a skill that is essential to
effective child and youth care practice: listening well.
Gerry Fewster is
well-known to readers of this Journal. In Turning My
Self Inside Out: My Theory of Me, Gerry is at his personal and
philosophical best as he reveals to us the meaning of 'self' for
him. It is a provocative and challenging read that demonstrates
the kind of thoughtful process we need t, bring to our field.
Meg Lindsay is new to
these pages. In a recent e-mail she said that she was glad to find
a journal in the field that liked stories, and she sent us a few.
Well, we are glad that she found us, and in the piece Mary,
we think that you will see why. In a few short pages Meg
demonstrates the potentially enduring power of the child and youth
care relationship. Once again, we see the power of the
relationship formed through daily life events.
Mark Krueger is
also well-known to readers of the Journal of Child and Youth
Care, and we are always happy to have him here. Over the past
few years Mark has been researching the role of 'presence' in
child and youth care relationships, in a particularly child and
youth care way. In Presence as Dance in Work With Youth,
Mark shares some of that research journey and his current thinking
with us. As always, we are struck by his ability to speak clearly
about profound things.
NEXT
COLUMN >>
|
|
Patti
MacKenna is also new to these pages, and we welcome her input. In Self:
It All Starts Here, Patti draws us into the developmental
world of the self of some youth care workers. In entering that
world with her we learn something about how child and youth care
workers come to experience self — theirs and others — in their
work. We are also pleased to offer this article because, like some
of the others here, it demonstrates an approach to research that
is well suited to this field: an approach that allows us to hear
the voices of those who are the object of the inquiry.
Penny Parry pops up
again at this point with a poem, Don't Swear. Creative
education has always been a strength of hers.
In a short and direct
article, You/Me/Us: Thoughts on Boundary Management in Child
and Youth Care, Varda Mann-Feder addresses one of the most
important questions in our work: where do I end and the other
begin? Personal and inter-personal boundaries are not paid enough
attention, we think, and thus we are pleased that Varda has raised
the issue here.
Stimulated by a
discussion on the relatively new e-mail discussion group, CYC-Net
(www.cyc-net.org), Craig Shealy set out to explore the meaning of
relationship to child and youth care professionals. In Ask a
Simple Question, Get a Complex Answer: Why "The
Relationship" in Child and Youth Care is Neither
"Sentimental" nor "Bogus", Craig offers us
some ideas about what child and youth care workers think about
relationships. We think you might be surprised.
Relationships:
What Is It We Do?... It Is What We Do!
is the title of the next article by Varley Weisman, and it could
well be the introductory comment to a discussion with someone who
wonders what we mean when we say relationship is central to child
and youth care practice. Varley discusses Some seemingly simple,
but deeply meaningful characteristics of good youth care workers
and insists that we need to deal with our own issues of "relationship
reluctance" if we are to help troubled youth develop
meaningful relationships with us.
Anyone who is aware of
the role of activities in child and youth care practice knows
Karen VanderVen. She is a campaigning advocate for the importance
of activities in developing relationships of trust and success
with young people. In You Are What You Do and Become What
You've Done: The Role of Activity in Development of Self,
Karen also introduces us to some of her thinking about the role of
self in activities with youth. Activities are, she suggests, not
only a place to do, but a place to be and develop, with self in
relationship.
Meg Lindsay also
reappears in Commentary with the story of developing the
use of life story books to help people discover parts of their
selves that may not be currently present in their lives. In Attempting
to Find the "Whole Person", Meg teaches us all a
little about this potentially powerful tool.
In our Journal Entries
section, Associate Editor Leanne Rose Sladde brings us a uniquely
personal perspective from Patricia LaPalme, and in our Book
Review section, Steve Bentheim discusses Relatives Raising
Children: An Overview of Kinship Care. |
Table of Contents
VOL 13(2)
iii Editorial
Questions About
Self and Relationship
Thom Garfat
vi In This Issue
1 Making a
Reflective Relationship-Based Decision: A Letter
Sydney Samakosky
5 It's My Kind of
Journal: A Love Relationship
Karl W. Gompf
9 Relationships: Thoughts
on Their Origin and Their Power
Penny Parry
17 Youth Who Attempt
Suicide: Exploring Their Experience of Relationship
Carol A. Stuart
35 Turning My Self
Inside-Out: My Theory of Me
Gerry Fewster
55 Mary
Meg Lindsay
59 Presence as Dance in
Work With Youth
Mark Krueger
73 Self: It All Starts
Here
Patti MacKenna
91 Don't Swear
Penny Parry
93 You/Me/Us: Thoughts on
Boundary Management in Child and Youth Care
Varda R. Mann-Feder
99 Ask a Simple Question,
Get a Complex Answer: Why "The Relationship" in Child and
Youth Care is Neither "Sentimental" nor "Bogus"
Craig Shealy
125 Relationships: What
Is It We Do? ... It Is What We Do!
Varley Weisman
133 You Are What You Do
and Become What You've Done: The Role of Activity in Development of
Self
Karen VanderVen
Regular Features
149 Commentary:
Attempting to Find the "Whole Person"
Meg Lindsay
155 Journal Entries
Patricia LaPalme
159 Book Review
Editorial
Questions about self and relationship
Thom Garfat
It seems that from the very
beginning child and youth care has been concerned with the notion of
self and self-in-relationship. Throughout the literature, the workshops,
and the practice of our field, self and relationship appear hand in
hand. We talk about the quality of relationships, the differences
between a therapeutic relationship and the other kind (is there really a
difference?), and the development of relationships. We also talk about
self-awareness, the role and use of self, and the presentation of self
(normally in relationships, of course). But important, and unanswered,
questions are raised by these discussions of self and relationship,
like:
- Is relationship really
central to our work?
- Does self exist independent
of relationship?
- If I am attending to
relationship, am I fully there 'in relationship' or is the part of
me that is monitoring self somehow outside of what is going on?
- When 'self' is aware, is it
aware of the part of self that is being in a state of awareness?
- What is this thing we call
self? Or this thing we call relationship?
It is our hope that this issue
of the Journal begins to at least address some of these issues,
if not to answer them.
Sometimes when I participate in, or overhear, conversations about 'self'
and the role or use of self in child and youth care, I think I am
wandering in the realm of the absurd. I mean, how can we have a
conversation about something that is, in essence, beyond talking about?
If the self is aware, I wonder, can it be aware of itself at the same
time that it is 'being in awareness'? It seems to me that what we must
be doing is applying a part of ourselves to look at that part of
ourselves which we can see (experience) which, by definition, makes the
observing part outside of the observation itself. Analyzing self seems
akin to the idea of an emotion feeling itself as it is occurring, or the
brain thinking about how it is thinking. It all seems very complicated
to me. I remember the old ideas of navel-gazing, or the snake swallowing
its own tail, and I wonder if this activity of 'being aware of self'
does not fall into the same category. I am further led to wonder if
'self' is only something we can reflect upon in retrospect, not in the
present. Don't get me wrong. I believe in self and the importance of
self in the youth care relationship. Sometimes I am just not sure what
it is I am believing in.
And I have the same kinds of questions about the notion of relationship
and being in relationship. Not that I don't think we can be in
relationship, but I do wonder if we can truly 'be in relationship' if we
are paying attention to whether or not we are so being. Again, it raises
the 'observer' question for me. If I am able to be objective enough to
notice whether or not I am being in relationship, am I not on the
outside looking in, rather than on the inside experiencing?
I do see a way out of my current difficulty but I am not sure that it
makes any more sense than what I have been talking about so far. I think
the answer might lay in the word (and experience of) 'being'. However,
it requires suspending our disbeliefs for a few minutes. It also
requires a letting go of this passion (or obsession) we seem to have
with understanding everything, or having our brains be the centre of our
interpretation of our experiences.
It seems to me that the more energy and activity I invest in the
analysis of my experiencing, the more distant I must become from the
actual experiencing itself. In other words, the more I think about what
I am experiencing, the more I am into the analysis, and the less I am
into the experiencing itself. For example, the more energy I spend in
noticing the elements of the relationship I am in, the less I am
actually in the relationship, and the more removed from actually 'being
in relationship' I become.
So then comes the question, can self actually be aware of self? Or can I
be in relationship and at the same time notice if I am so being?
It seems to me that the answer to those two questions has to be no.
Which leads me to the conclusion that 'being' requires the suspension of
concurrent analysis as we usually think of it. And this of course is
where the notion of self takes on active meaning for me because when I
suspend the analysis of my experiencing as I am in the act of that
experiencing, then I think maybe I am truly with self. And if I would be
with another person, it would seem that I would also have to give up my
analysis of that other in order to truly be with that other person. So,
in order to be in relationship, a genuine self-to-self relationship,
both I and the other person would have to suspend the process of
analysis of both self and other, as we usually think of it.
Now I realize that there is a danger to this suggestion of the
suspension of our tendency to be so analytic: that people will think it
means we should just go ahead and be in relationship with others without
thinking about what we are doing. Nothing could be farther from the
truth. To be able to be in relationship with other, which requires a
deep understanding of, and ability to be with, one's self is an activity
that requires courage, sensitivity and consideration.
The courage is necessary in order to let go of the defenses we normally
use to limit our experiencing. The sensitivity is necessary in order to
be able to have the experience and the consideration is necessary, both
before and after the act, to allow us to be able to actually 'be' with
intentionality.
So, to go back to the beginning: what is self and what is relationship?
It is our hope that this issue of the Journal may help you to
address these essential questions. But before I go, let me leave you
with an embarrassingly simple little exercise which, if you do it
honestly, may make all of the foregoing more meaningful.
Take a deep breath. Let it out. Notice how much you were thinking about
what you were doing. Now do it again and while you are doing so, don't
think about what you are doing. Suspend your analytical tendencies. Just
experience it. Now, keep doing this until you can take a deep breath and
let it out without having a thought about what you are doing. Once you
can do it on your own, find a willing partner and do it together until
you can both breathe together without thinking about what you are doing.
Now find something you want to experience about yourself while you are
with the other. And then find something you want to experience of the
other. Just as you did with your breathing, allow yourself to experience
the other without the defensive limitations of your own thinking.
Now go and experience this issue. And don't think about it too hard.
___
|