
ISSUE 105 OCTOBER 2007
CONTENTS
HOME PAGE
|
LETTER
A regular CYC-Online reader and member of the
CYC-Net Discussion Group responds to the Editorial in the August
issue of this webmag: CYC-Net upgrades website — “Real Appeal” What a great job done on the new look and
features of the CYC-Net site! As I try to imagine all that’s
involved in the running of the many aspects of CYC-Net, especially
in light of all these new projects, I’m reminded of August’s CYC-Online
Editorial message, “A Real Appeal”* which stated “Since the
beginning of this fiscal year (April 1) CYC-Net has received no
financial support from its thousands of world-wide users — more than
two thousand unique visitors a day to its web site and more than
three thousand members of the discussion group.” For me, the matter boils down to this: CYC-Net is NOT adequately supported — it is
unacceptable that available resources would be so low such that
CYC-Net would need to shut down in order to do upgrades — to
develop and grow CYC-Net is requesting financial support from
it’s members (consumers) CYC-Net is suggesting $12 per year Integrity is at stake for CYC-Net members
(and in turn, the image of CYC as a profession) If one considers the request reasonable (as I
did), then comply with it; on the other hand, should the request be
considered unreasonable, then let’s discuss, shall we — POST AWAY! The August 2007 CYC-ONLINE Editorial is titled,
“A Real Appeal” and the first that has come to my attention.
However, I learn from the article that this is not the first appeal
CYC-Net has made to its consumers for financial support. How were
earlier such campaigns received, you might ask? Here is what the
editors said: *QUOTE In a recent CYC-Net email discussion post, the
Editors take the opportunity to welcome “the large group of
newcomers to the Discussion Group who have joined up during the last
two weeks.” Another hunch I have is that a large number of those
newcomers are new CYC students who may already know or are learning
of the importance in our field of modeling integrity — to do
otherwise is to set an example of otherwise for children and youth,
which is unacceptable and unethical from CYC practitioners. I’ll go as far as to say that “a overwhelming
silence” (from CYC practitioners, organizations, professional
regional associations, students, educators, academic schools, etc.)
to “A Real Appeal” from CYC-Net for financial support is likewise
both unacceptable and unethical. Let’s break the silence and get on
with it, shall we? Go grab the chequebook and write a cheque for
say 15 bucks (Can, US, Aus, or that ballpark of your currency) What, too much? Then first send less, before
making sure to share your thoughts about it in the email discussion
group! Make cheque out to CYC-Net, throw it in an
envelope addressed to either Find your old snail-mail stamps (use a glue
stick if they were as old and dusty as mine were) and put enough of
them on there to cover postage, or if you can’t find your stamps,
just take to a postal outlet to pay postage. Then MAIL IT! And then maybe we can get past this as our
embarrassing “overwhelming silence” is broken at last! Now, some might choose to send in their cheques
silently. For the rest of us, I have a request myself — If you are
in favour of contributing financially to CYC-Net and would like to
make further comments on the matter, then how about we have it be
that “my cheque is in the mail” before we make that post, and say so
within it? I’m anxious to hear what CYCers have to say either way —
with integrity. * You can see the Editorial “A Real Appeal”,
ISSUE 103, AUGUST 2007 here: My cheque is in the mail. Davey |