|
READING FOR CHILD
AND YOUTH CARE WORKERS
IN A NUTSHELL — BY HENRY W. MAIER
New Days are Coming Hello, careworkers and administrators. In the past my message in this column has been primarily for
careworkers. My comments this time are for careworkers and with them
their administrative staff. I would appreciate it if careworkers and
other readers could share the following content with their respective
administrators who might not have turned to my input for this month. Around this time of year most programs seem to consider an updated
start. I think it might be an appropriate time for all programs to take
a look at their practice and program structure, to check whether it is
in tune with the demands of the youngsters presently in care. By my observations many programs continue practices which were
introduced to deal with difficulties at a particular earlier time, or
with the assumed needs of children in care then. In a review of your
program you might discover that the waking-up time or other scheduled
demands were adopted to suit selected youngsters or employees at that
time. So, is your breakfast time really in tune with your current
population or in response to the getting-off-to-school time of earlier
days? Similarly, do your youngsters really need so much time to get
dressed and ready for the day? Are those sketchy breakfast hours really
appropriate for the children, or were they set up to adapt to the
demands of the kitchen staff? What would be realistic for today's
children? It might make sense to think through the daily on-duty schedule of
the careworkers. What kind of hourly arrangements would facilitate
continuous time with the children and fit appropriately to the staff
members' contracted working time? Moreover, I think many activities, like time to be out- or indoors,
relate to bygone residents' needs rather than to the capabilities of the
group's current make-up. Also I noticed that in many programs the children spend an unusual
amount of time with clean-up activities, such as sweeping and mopping
the floors. These chores might have been initiated when staff felt
unsure of what to do with the children, and suggested that mopping of
the dining room, hallways, and other areas might be worthwhile
occupations. Please evaluate whether the place really needs such
repeated cleaning and explore what fun activities could be substituted
for these former tasks. I'm sure as you openly review your program you might detect a good
number of practices which are more for the staff's sake, or a previous
generation of children's sake — than for today's children's sake. Are
you ready to face such potential challenges? I wish you a very productive time. These deliberations might stretch
out for weeks — and to be challenged by them requires open courage. Have fun and a new day, for 2002 is coming! I should be delighted if
you should share with me what happened on the basis of such staff
meetings. I would welcome knowing because I feel I'm with you. Good cheers,
Henry
|