DYFS workers and reform
 

Some perspective

 The headlines about the embattled state Division of Youth and Family Services came one after another in 2003: A child found dead in a Newark basement after DYFS closed the case. Nine DYFS workers fired after four boys were found starving in their adoptive home. Strong words from Gov. James E. McGreevey. The resignation of Human Services Commissioner Gwendolyn Harris. Never-ending calls for reform.

But here's something people should remember, something that often gets lost in the headlines.

First: Nobody goes into social work looking to get rich. And second: Nobody goes into social work wanting to see children suffer. People generally go into this line of work for the noblest of reasons.

Consider recent comments by New York City social worker Trevor John, who finds a great deal of reward in his unglamorous, difficult, heart-wrenching job:

“I'm an agent for change — that's the gratification I get. I'm the one who puts the first foot into that family's home. We're the first responders when something goes wrong with children. Within three or four weeks, you're engaged with that family and you begin to see change,” he said.

That's why, undoubtedly, the vast majority of DYFS workers went into that profession in the first place. They wanted to make a difference. And often they do. Their successes don't make headlines.

But we suspect the vastness of the problem and the weight of the bureaucracy can be pretty crushing. Morale at the agency, in the wake of last year's failures and publicity, is reportedly at an all-time low.

We're not sure how to solve the problems at DYFS. Certainly, caseworkers whose neglect or wrongdoing causes children to suffer should be disciplined or fired. Reforms must be implemented, whatever it takes — from structural changes to lighter caseloads to providing such essentials as cell phones.

But somehow, reform must also accomplish this: The agency must revive and nurture the spark that caused so many caseworkers to go into this kind of work in the first place. They wanted to be an agent of change. They wanted to make a positive difference in the lives of children. That's something public officials — and the public — need to keep in mind.


16 January 2004
 

 http://www.pressofatlanticcity.com/news/columns/010204DYFSWORKERS.html

 

home