|

OPINION
Father's Day
To cure family ills, men must again find fathering
- not just paternity to be masculine
Reconnecting fatherhood, masculinity
A community that allows a large number of young men to grow up in
broken homes, dominated by women, never acquiring any stable
relationship to male authority, never acquiring any rational
expectations about the future that community asks for and gets
chaos. ... Daniel Patrick Moynihan, 1965
On Father's Day, our community, state and nation
remain at risk from forces other than terrorism. Fatherhood is
blossoming in many homes but is totally absent in others. The result is
generations of young people growing up without the influence of fathers
and young males in particular not understanding fatherhood and what is
expected of them as they become fathers.
According to The National Fatherhood Initiative:
The most disturbing social trend of our time is the dramatic increase
in father-absent families. In 1960, the total number of children living
in single-parent families was slightly less than 6 million. Today, the
number is a staggering 18 million. The percentage of America's children
living in a home in which their biological father does not live stands
at nearly 40 percent. By some estimates, 55 to 60 percent of all
children born in the 1990s will spend part of their childhood in a
fatherless home. For the first time in our history, the average child
can expect to live a significant portion of his life in a home without
father.
The Fatherhood Initiative, about which we have written
previously, is dedicated to reversing the trend, all the while noting it
won't be easy. Fathers make unique and irreplaceable contributions to
the lives of their children. They are more than part-time substitutes
for mothers. They cannot be replaced by child-support money or mentors.
Children need their fathers.
Second, we have to state the truth that men are more
likely to be responsible fathers in the context of committed and legal
marriages. In other words, divorce is not OK.
Thirdly, we must stop suggesting divorce can somehow
be good or neutral for children. It once was considered a virtue to
remain together for the sake of the kids. That changed, with a belief
that separation was better. Data and studies debunk the myth. So does
common sense. In most instances, children are better off with married
parents even if the marriage is an unhappy one than when their
parents divorce. Even in an era when government solutions are considered
things of the past, government has a role to play. Not the least of the
requirements might be a simple one used in some courts today: requiring
parents to attend a course on the impact of divorce on children. The
real solution, however, is not with government. It is with the society
that has produced a tragic redefinition of fatherhood and masculinity.
As has been noted by more than one observer: Men will not move back into
the family until our culture reconnects masculinity and fatherhood,
until men come to see fathering not just paternity as the fullest
expression of manhood.
The media have a role to play. The job of
communicators is to do a better job of reflecting good, wise and
responsible fathers. They are everywhere. And they are major models of
masculinity as sure as they are loving fathers. Separating fatherhood
and masculinity is a cultural course that must be reversed.
Folks, no one will raise our children for us ... This is the most
important work of our lives. It's the source of our greatest possible
pleasure and pain. The responsibilities and choices are ours.
columnist Robert J. Samuelson, 1992.
21 June 2004
http://www.timesanddemocrat.com/articles/2004/06/20/opinion/opinion1.txt
home /
Previous feature
|