|

NEW JERSEY
Children in foster care are bouncing from home to home
at a higher rate.
NJ children safer, but it's hard to
keep foster families
Despite a massive recruiting drive to get more foster
families, New Jersey has about the same number of them as it did two
years ago, according to a new report. The study, released Wednesday by
the Association for Children of New Jersey, also found that since
reforms to the Division of Youth and Family Services were launched in
2003, children under the state's care are safer. But getting and keeping
foster parents remains a problem. In 2004, there were 3,913; this year,
there were 4,005. Even as hundreds of new families volunteer, others
leave the system. "The question is: How do you develop homes that stay?"
said Cecilia Zalkind, executive director of the association.
Mary Jane Awrachow, executive director of Foster and
Adoptive Family Services, a nonprofit support and advocacy group that
contracts with the state, said some families adopt children and stop
taking in more foster children, some are frightened off by more onerous
licensing requirements and some find the job too difficult without
enough support. "These families are volunteers for the state. They
really are doing this as volunteers," she said. "When it's too much,
it's too much and they close their homes."
Human Services Commissioner Kevin Ryan said the state
was smart a few years ago to train some Division of Youth and Family
Services staff to work exclusively with foster parents. Given a more
powerful role, he said, those workers might be able to give foster
families enough support to keep taking children.
The report also found that children in foster care in
New Jersey are bouncing from home to home at a higher rate than they
were before the state began the massive reform effort. In 2002, about 54
percent of children in foster care had been in two or more homes; last
year, that figure was 60 percent, according to the association's
analysis. Ryan said those numbers might be faulty because they could
count some children as having moved who were in the same relative's home
all along. Still, Human Services spokeswoman Mary Helen Cervantes said
the state wants to have children move from family to family less often.
The report _ one of the first independent studies on
the impact of child-welfare reforms in New Jersey _ found that on
several other fronts the system has improved over the last three years.
The state Division of Youth and Family Services' intense focus on
dealing with child-abuse has helped reduce the number of children who
are abused repeatedly, the report found. Zalkind said some of the gains
have been very small, but substantial enough to show the state that it
needs to keep putting money into a child-welfare system that until a few
years ago rarely got big boosts in state money. "This speaks strongly to
the need to stay on course and continue the investment for reform,"
Zalkind said.
Gov. Jon S. Corzine has proposed creating a new
Cabinet-level department dedicated solely to child welfare. But in
budget discussions the last few months, some lawmakers have questioned
increasing child-welfare spending. Ryan said he and the governor are
encouraged by the improvements noted, but recognize that more needs to
be done. "The governor's proposed budget, along with the creation of a
new department focused solely on kids and families, will help accelerate
our progress to protect and ensure a brighter future for New Jersey's
most vulnerable children," Ryan said. Three years ago, the state settled
a lawsuit filed by a children's advocacy group and made a pledge to fix
a broken agency that was in the midst of a string of tragedies in which
children under the state's watch were harmed or even killed.
Since then, New Jersey has added hundreds of
caseworkers and changed many of its procedures. Experts following the
reforms have said they're moving too slowly and are not purposeful
enough. New Jersey and Children's Rights Inc., the New York advocacy
group that sued to force child-welfare reform, have been negotiating how
to fix reform efforts. A deadline for an agreement, previously set for
Monday, was moved to June 23.
Geoff Mukvihill
14 June 2006
http://www.newsday.com/news/local/wire/newjersey/ny-bc-nj--dyfsreform0614jun14,0,3584072.story?coll=ny-region-apnewjersey
home
/
Previous feature
|