|

Suicide rates in youth jails are a national scandal. But one infamous
institution is attempting to turn the tide
Behind the razor wire with Britain's
lost generation
Ian's childhood milestones are ones no parent would
wish to put in a photo album. Aged seven, he went on his first drinking
binge. At 11 he tried drugs. His first court appearance was at 13. The
18-year-old is considered a risk to himself and others. He has a
conviction for attempted rape and a long history of self-harm — ugly
scars run all the way up his arm.
Sitting in his T-shirt and sweat pants, he comes
across as inadequate and acutely self-conscious. He is typical of the
many deeply damaged boys sent to Feltham Young Offenders Institution (YOI),
near Heathrow airport, one of the largest prisons of its kind. It has a
reputation for turning around tearaways labelled “beyond reform”. Ian
has made progress while at Feltham, which he has been encouraged to
record in a daily diary. One extract provides a stark insight into how
much help he needs: “I watched a documentary called 'Chatting to Death'
about people who feel suicidal but don't speak about it so go into
chatrooms ... [It] made me feel happy to have the support of the staff.”
The majority of young offenders are extremely
vulnerable, as the suicide last week of 14-year-old Adam Rickwood in the
Hassockfield centre near Consett, Co Durham, demonstrated. It was
thought to be the youngest ever suicide in custody. There have been
around 25 self-inflicted deaths in young offender institutions since
1990. Feltham has had its share of controversy. In March 2000, racist
Robert Stewart, an inmate on the young offenders wing, beat to death his
19-year-old cell-mate, Zahid Mubarek, with a table leg. Next month a
public inquiry will open into the killing. Stewart is now serving a life
sentence.
In the past four years staff have tried hard to
overturn the negative image. Currently Feltham has about 11 inmates at
risk of self-harm. A poster reads: “Suicide is Everyone's Concern”. The
last here was three years ago. Those at risk are held in cells designed
to be safe: bed and sink moulded to the walls, push-button taps, no
sharp edges. Everyone is treated equally regardless of their crime. What
matters is how they reform while inside. The better their behaviour, the
more privileges they earn. The majority of the 286 inmates aged 15 to 18
in “A” wing are sent here for drug offences and theft. Two are
registered sex offenders and some have convictions for murder.
Twenty-five per cent are foreigners. Illiteracy is common. Crop-haired
burglar Jack, 17, cannot write his name. “I never went to school in my
life,” he says. Staff have worked hard to challenge his aggression and
racism. Six months on he is acclaimed as one of their success stories.
Many of the “lost boys” arrive unable to make a bed
because they have spent years sleeping rough. Some have never visited a
doctor or dentist and have poor personal hygiene. Dishes such as lasagne
and shepherd's pie are a novelty for young men who have never eaten a
home-cooked meal. Carol Gaskin, in charge of juveniles at Feltham, says
boys who have spent their lives in care often see crime as the only way
to survive. One of them has already been in 42 institutions. Punishment
is not a word that is used at Feltham. Staff reward good behaviour with
privileges such as watching TV and wearing one's own trainers. Bad
behaviour includes swearing and fighting.
A mother of three grown-up children, Ms Gaskin says
she tries to treat the boys as she would treat her own: “We set
boundaries and encourage them to take responsibility.” The timetable is
similar to that of a school, with three education sessions a day.
Cooking, music and art are the most popular subjects.
Dayo Adeagbo, who works in the education block, is
helping put together a mural painted by inmates. Surely instilling
discipline in boys who have never spent more than a few weeks at school
is impossible? He smiles: “You just channel their energy. I've never met
a bad boy at Feltham. If you label them challenging, then challenging
they will be.”
___
Is there an alternative to locking up children?
Stephen Pilkington, Acpo spokesman on youth justice issues and chief
constable of Avon and Somerset: “We want to avoid having people in secure facilities,
but it is an inevitable consequence when the protection of a community
and the protection of the youngster is paramount.”
Ann Widdecombe, Conservative MP and former Home Office
minister: “We are dealing with an inherently unstable population
and we are not giving them the necessary supervision. The current
suicide rate is far too great. We need more secure training centres.”
Marjorie Wallace, Chief executive of SANE: “The staff in many places are not trained to deal with
psychologically damaged people. If they are mentally ill they shouldn't
be in prison. For people who are already feeling lonely, it must be the
worst experience.”
Maurice Rumbold, Chief executive of children's charity
NCH: “More use needs to be made of community sentences
which are more effective than custody in preventing re-offending and
ensuring that children take responsibility for their actions.”
Mark Leech, Former young offender, editor of 'The
Prisoners' Handbook': “These youngsters are prolific re-offenders, who could
be turned around with more education. Otherwise they are destined to be
tomorrow's old lags, creating more victims of crime.”
Norman Brennan, Director, Victims of Crime Trust: “Those that are in prison deserve to be there. It is
tragic that youngsters commit suicide, but many of them would do it even
if they weren't locked up.”
Sophie Goodchild, Interviews by Steve Bloomfield
15 August 2004
http://news.independent.co.uk/uk/crime/story.jsp?story=551553
home /
Previous feature
|