|

REGULATION FOR YOUTH PROGRAMS
Keeping an eye on the kids
In the ongoing battle over who should provide
governmental oversight of Montana’s teen behavior modification programs,
the latest answer seems to be: the people who already run them.
The newly appointed Private Alternative Adolescent
Residential Program Board was scheduled to meet for the first time
Thursday, Sept. 8. Created under the umbrella of the state labor
department earlier this year, the board’s purpose is to “examine the
benefit of licensing private adolescent residential or outdoor
programs,” of which there are more than 30 in Montana. Montana is one of
the last states in the country with no oversight of the controversial
teen help industry, and at least one Montana legislator isn’t sure the
new board will give the state the necessary regulatory powers.
“I’m still of the belief that oversight has to be done
through the Department of Public Heath and Human Services,” says Great
Falls Sen. Trudi Schmidt, who offered her own version of an oversight
bill in the state Senate that was rejected. “This is the first time that
the Department of Labor is regulating a youth services program.”
Trout Creek Rep. Paul Clark, who operates Galena Ridge
Wilderness Program for Teens (and authored HB 628) is one of the
“program” representatives of the board, along with Spring Creek Lodge
principal Michele “Mickey” Manning of Thompson Falls and Mary Alexine of
the Chrysalis School in Eureka. The two “public” members of the board
include Sanders County Commissioner Carol Brooker and Dr. Maureen
Neihart, a child psychologist from Laurel.
Shelby Earnshaw, director of the International
Survivors Action Committee, a teen program watchdog group based in
Virginia, says having program representatives in the majority on the
board could endanger the children in the care of the facilities, many of
which are in remote locations in the western part of the state.
“I don’t think that running an unlicensed, unregulated
program makes anyone an expert on how to do it. They’ve been running
programs in Montana for years precisely because there is no regulation,”
says Earnshaw. “This looks to be a really half-hearted attempt by the
state of Montana to look like they are doing something to regulate. If
the folks that are running the schools are the ones making the rules,
Montana won’t have any regulation with teeth.”
John S. Adams
8 September 2005
http://www.missoulanews.com/News/News.asp?no=5155
home
/
Previous
viewpoint |