HOMELESSNESS DEBATE

Spare change pleas test city’s patience

[
Jamie, who didn’t give his last name, panhandles outside the downtown
Meyer & Frank store last week. The Portland Business Alliance has started
a “Real change, not spare change” campaign that advises giving to social
service agencies rather than directly to individuals on the street. Pic; Jim Clark

Having taken a hard line on several controversial issues so far this year, the City Council now is igniting a new debate over panhandling. Commissioner Erik Sten, who is leading the city’s 10-year plan to end chronic homelessness, has suggested that the city coordinate an “aggressive effort” with police to crack down on panhandlers. “I think (people) will find they’re not necessarily homeless,” he said. “There’s a lot of cynicism around our efforts to end homelessness because of these issues. It’s very timely for council to have an initiative on these issues.” Sten added: “I think people shouldn’t give money to panhandlers. There’s so many other places to give.” Commissioner Dan Saltzman has suggested that the city post signs at freeway onramps and other rights of way that panhandlers typically occupy. “It could say, ‘The city and social service agencies recommend you don’t give money to panhandlers because it goes for alcohol and drugs,’ something like that,” Saltzman said. “Universally, every social service provider I’ve spoken to says, ‘Don’t give money to panhandlers because it goes for alcohol and drugs.’ I think if we’re serious about efforts to deal with the panhandling problem, that this could be a way of doing it.”
Any council initiative regarding panhandling likely will spark a broad community debate just as the city’s sidewalk ordinance did, because it touches on the balance between freedom of expression and the overburdened justice and social service systems. Ed Johnson, an attorney at the Oregon Law Center, said city leaders don’t need to be any more aggressive. “Portland does not need any additional criminalization of panhandling,” said Johnson, who has represented panhandlers in civil cases in the past.

“The things that are illegal now are blocking somebody’s way on the sidewalk, physically assaulting anyone, blocking the entranceway to a business, and this catchall of disorderly conduct. So if someone’s shouting at you and following you down the street, those things are already illegal.” At the other end of the spectrum are downtown retailers, who have long complained that the groups of people — often youths — who sit on sidewalks downtown and ask for money are a deterrent to business.
“While I have a great deal of empathy for people on the street, I also am trying to run a successful business,” said Vickie Jubinville, owner of Ben Bridge Jeweler on Southwest Fifth Avenue and co-chairwoman of the Downtown Retail Council. “We just want an environment that is the most attractive and enjoyable for our customers to do their business.” Panhandlers, meanwhile, are appalled that the city is trying to crack down on them. “Sometimes you get so far behind that you can’t get caught up,” said a man named A.J., asking passers-by for money outside the old Pioneer Courthouse one rainy morning. “It’s like someone puts you in a round room and then they tell you to go stand in the corner.”

Many agencies stay on fence

Social service providers seem to fall somewhere in the middle of the debate. “Nobody likes aggressive panhandlers. I agree with that,” said Kathy Oliver, executive director of Outside In, which provides services to homeless youths. “On the other hand, we have freedom of speech in this country, and people have the right to ask for money.” Oliver said the city should be looking at different approaches to resolve the panhandling issue, since “it does seem to have gotten a little out of control.” One approach has been the Portland Business Alliance’s “Real change, not spare change” campaign, which encourages people to support social service agencies directly rather than hand out cash on the street. The program began in the early 1990s with books of 25-cent vouchers that could be redeemed for food, showers, transit and clothing from Sisters of the Road Cafe, Transition Projects, New Avenues for Youth and Outside In.
In December, the alliance expanded the program by placing 18 old city street meters in stores and other spots around town, through which people could deposit money that is matched by the alliance and sent directly to local social service agencies. “We’re trying to remind people there are very good agencies that are serving these youths and to encourage people to support those agencies,” said Sandra McDonough, executive director of the Portland Business Alliance. But Oliver said that neither her agency nor New Avenues for Youth “has ever seen someone come in with the coupons,” she said. “I’m all for finding alternatives here, but so far no one’s come up with a good one.”

Portland chosen over Seattle

Oliver said Saltzman’s sign idea might be a good one if it doesn’t characterize all panhandlers as using the money they collect for drugs and alcohol. Twenty-four-year-old T.J. Edwards is appalled by the idea of signs discouraging giving. “I think that would be totally cruel,” he said, gladly accepting the $1 bill a passer-by hands him outside Pioneer Place one recent morning. “That would be like putting up signs that say ‘Blacks only’ and ‘Whites only.’ There’s a class difference of people.” Edwards, who ran away from foster care at age 13 and has lived with friends ever since, regularly panhandles downtown with his two dogs, one of which he’s taught to pose as a statue wearing a sweatshirt and sunglasses and sporting a cigarette that dangles from her mouth.
The act and “Will work for kibble” sign nets $40 to $60 per day, which Edwards is saving to head south to Mexico with friends, he said. Compared to his native Seattle, “there’s a bigger response here” to street performers and panhandlers due to the city’s slower pace, he said. “People here can stop and smell the flowers if they want.”

Jennifer Anderson
19 April 2005

http://www.portlandtribune.com/archview.cgi?id=29399

home / Previous viewpoint