Children
can kill, steal, humiliate and lie. Nobody needs to
be reminded of the Bulger case in Britain a few
years back when two kids battered a toddler to death
with bricks and an iron rod. Another more recent
example is the brutal killing of the young girl in
Yorkshire by a group of boys and girls roughly her
own age. She was wilfully set upon, beaten and
kicked to death. The fact that kids can steal and
lie, needs no examples. Kids humiliating and
assaulting others have reached a chilling new level,
as can be witnessed in the phenomenon of ‘happy
slapping’ where children use their mobile telephone
to film their physical assault on a lone child. This
phenomenon is just another example of anti-social
and uncivilized behavior displayed by the current
generation of children.
How can we, in the light of these facts and
irrefutable evidence, still say with such absolute
conviction that children are completely innocent?
Innocent beyond all doubt! The idea of childhood
innocence has had such a tremendous influence on the
West that the E.U. has enacted a law forbidding the
spanking of children. No citizen in the E.U. is
allowed to physically chastise their children – no
matter what the circumstances. The big bureaucrats
in brother Brussels have equated spanking with
torture and have empowered one of its watchdogs, the
World Organization Against Torture, to peer into the
last domain of privacy and autonomy of our society
namely, the family home. The mechanisms of power
have finally succeeded in usurping the authority
vested in the family unit, the cornerstone of our
civilization.
Children are now at liberty – and are encouraged
– to call the authorities if their parents so much
as lay a hand on them. The line between slapping,
spanking, shaking, pinching, etc. is all but
academic now because any forceful action directed at
children by their parents can henceforth be classed
as ‘torture’. What is the difference between a light
smack on the bottom and the visible bruise that is
left after a father has, in the last moment, managed
to grab his small daughter by the arm just before
she run into the path of an oncoming bus?
Do children have the ability to distinguish
between actions, on the part of the parents, to harm
them and actions intended to protect them? In other
words, do they have the moral ability to discern the
parameters separating good and bad, right from
wrong? This is exactly what we are asking them to
do. We are asking them to do something that we’ve
struggled with our whole lives. It has never been
easy to accurately judge the bearings on our moral
compass, but at least we have the benefit of years
of life experience, an education, socio-cultural
values and norms and theological/philosophical
beliefs-systems. This is, however, not good enough
for the powers that be in Brussels. They have
effectively delegated this burden to four-year olds,
and in doing so, given children the moral authority
to sit in judgment on their parents. In other words,
kids now have the right to decide whether the
actions of their parents are morally justifiable or
not. If the latter be the case, then children have
the moral duty and legal obligation to send their
parents for punishment to/by Brussels.
This topsy-turvy situation is so bizarre one can
nearly visualize a four-year-old asking himself,
"Was that illegal smack Mommy gave me a measured
response and a morally justifiable act in the light
of the possible negative consequences of my action
that was so abruptly interrupted by the current
burning sensation on my backside?" Little Johnny
then has a flash of inspiration and exclaims,
"Mommy, I won’t tell uncle Brussels about you
torturing me if you let me ride my skateboard on the
neighbor’s car again like I’ve been doing for the
past three days, oh yes, and up my allowance with a
few quid because the money the school pays me to
attend class doesn’t even cover my telephone bill!".
In all seriousness, how the hell did we land in
this mess? Well, it all stems from the fanatical
belief in the innocence of childhood that is
mesmerizing disillusioned baby-boomers. Not the
innocence of children as it should be, but our
version of childhood innocence superimposed on the
lives of our children. The cult of innocence has its
roots in the reality Sigmund Freud created for us, a
world in which we have all been traumatized by an
evil ‘external’ reality that has stolen our
innocence. An evil world largely comprised of the
predatory perversions of pale males (see the
articles Manhood and its Malcontents and
Innocentopia). Our innocence has been stolen from us
by Freud’s two gods, Eros (sex) and Thanathos
(violence), who came down from the heavens and
manifested themselves in their two most loathsome
forms; pedophilia and torture.
The current bogeyman, the institutional pedophile
(created in Ireland), is lurking behind every
corner. And just like in Bush’s Guantanamo Bay we
can find the torturer, the new bogeyman (created in
Brussels), in the family home. In other words, every
father has become a potential pedophile and every
mother a potential torturer. Once we have slain
these two gods we’ll be cured of our trauma and can
return to a life of childhood bliss once more. A
utopia of innocence safely insolated from the harsh
realities of the world ‘out there’. Absolute
HOGWASH!
It all sounds good and well if we were living in
Freud’s cloud-cuckoo land, but we are not and the
responsibilities of adulthood are ours to bear, not
our children’s! We can never regain that which we
have lost when we became adults. We will never again
experience the wonder of discovering love,
friendship and all the other amazing things in the
world for the first time. Youthful vitality, the
will to explore and the passion to change the world
are ours no more. We are stuck with the fleeting
pleasures that can be derived from getting another
promotion, buying a new ‘Beat My Willy’ (BMW) or SUV
and going to the Bahamas for another boring holiday.
That’s just the way things are and shirking our
responsibilities won’t change it. It is up to us to
have the moral fortitude to decide between right and
wrong, good and bad. Pushing kids out of their world
and claiming it for ourselves because we cannot
distinguish between trauma and disillusionment is
absolutely reprehensible, in every which way you
look at it. It is imperative that we stay this
madness in all possible haste because some kids are
already stranded in the world we’ve abandoned. And
they have learned to survive in that world - by
killing, stealing, humiliating and lying. The fact
that they don’t make any attempt to hide their
crimes is a chilling indication that they are only
taking their first baby steps in a world in which it
requires devious scheming and murderous cunning to
have your way – and get away with it.
Yes, children are innocent, but we have taken
that away from them, by trying to become like them.
Albert Brenner