|
THE
INTERNATIONAL CHILD AND YOUTH CARE NETWORK
HOME / OTHER
JOURNALS
EXTRACTS FROM OTHER JOURNALS
RELATING TO CHILDREN, YOUTH AND FAMILIES — IN THE FIELDS OF HEALTH,
SUBSTANCE ABUSE, EDUCATION, PSYCHOLOGY, SCIENCE
February 2001
Stars` Onscreen Smoking Influences
Teen Tobacco Use
Teenagers' smoking behavior is
directly linked to the portrayal of tobacco use by their favorite movie
stars. A new study suggests that adolescents who favor movie stars that
use tobacco onscreen are significantly more likely to smoke and have
more favorable attitudes toward smoking than adolescents who favor
non-smoking stars.
Previous research has focused on movie stars' tobacco use onscreen and
the effect on teen smoking behavior. In this study, researchers asked
the teens to identify their favorite movie stars and examined particular
movie stars' onscreen tobacco use and its influence on adolescents'
smoking behavior.
"We found a nice association between onscreen smoking of the
favorite movie stars and the adolescents' likelihood to take up smoking
or have positive attitude about smoking," says study author
Jennifer Tickle, a PhD-candidate at Dartmouth College in Hanover, New
Hampshire. "Although the study didn't address a causal element, the
potential that actors' portrayal of smoking onscreen are affecting
adolescents is a quite good one."
Researchers evaluated 632 students between the ages 10 and 19 (sixth
through 12th grades) from five rural New England public schools in 1996.
Researchers divided the students into five groups based on their smoking
behavior and their smoking susceptibility: non-susceptible never
smokers, susceptible never smokers, non-current experimenters, current
experimenters, and established smokers.
Researchers studied the tobacco use by 43 movie stars identified by at
least five students as their favorite stars in films between 1994 and
1996. Of the 43 stars, 65% used tobacco at least once, and 42% portrayed
smoking as an essential character trait in one or more films.
Researchers say that stars who smoked more than twice in a film were
considered smokers.
According to researchers, the more teens' favorite stars smoked
onscreen, the more likely it was for those teens to take up smoking.
"Even among never smokers, those who chose stars who were smokers
in three or more films were much more likely to have favorable attitudes
toward smoking," says Tickle. "We should take a closer look at
what's being portrayed in movies."
Sean Duren, director of tobacco control and comprehensive school health
education at the American Cancer Society region 17 in New Jersey, says
that studies like this will certainly raise the awareness of how smoking
is portrayed in movies. "Movie stars are teen idols," says
Duren. "When it comes to certain behaviors, teens tend to imitate
them."
Duren says that he hopes in the future, the amount of smoking seen in
movies will be looked at a bit differently with all the anti-tobacco
campaigns going on. "I think movies already over- represent
smoking," says Duren. "More and more people are aware of the
negative health consequences of smoking, and many have quit."
Danny McGoldrick, research director at the Campaign for Tobacco Free
Kids in Washington, D.C., says that the findings are not surprising.
They confirm that cultural influence have a big impact on young people
who get many positive cues about tobacco. "We need to counter the
environment that puts a positive image of smoking in movies," says
McGoldrick. "We should change the cultural norm of tobacco
use."
McGoldrick says that teens smoking increased by a third from 1991 to
1997, and it has leveled off since then. But due to the incredible
promotion by the tobacco industry, kids tend to overestimate the number
of their peers and adults who smoke. "Movies already over represent
smoking, hopefully, if we are successful in reducing smoking among
adolescents and adults, Hollywood will get a clue and diminish the
appearance of onscreen smoking."
The study is published in the Feb. 27 issue of the British specialty
journal Tobacco Control.
Unexpected Divorce May Be Worse for
Kids
Adults in unhappy marriages who stay married for their children's
benefit may be doing more harm than good to their children if the
marriage involves a lot of fighting, results of a recent study suggest.
On the other hand, an "unexpected" divorce between silently
battling partners may leave a child feeling worse after the split than
children with similar parents who choose to stick it out, study findings
show.
"In general, our results suggest that divorce may be beneficial or
harmful to children, depending on whether it reduces or increases the
amount of stress to which children are exposed," according to study
authors Dr. Alan Booth and Dr. Paul R. Amato of Pennsylvania State
University in University Park.
Booth and Amato conducted a 17-year study of more than 2,000 married
individuals and nearly 700 children. Eighty-five divorces occurred
during the study period.
The researchers found that pre-divorce marital conflict had more of an
impact on the child's well-being than the divorce itself, Booth and
Amato report in the February issue of the Journal of Marriage and
Family.
For example, children of parents who rarely fought or disagreed were
less happy after their parent's divorce than children of low-conflict
parents who remained married, findings show. In contrast, children of
parents in high-conflict relationships reported higher levels of
well-being after their parents' divorce than did children of
high-conflict parents who did not split up.
"Children suffer greatly when parents in a low-conflict marriage
divorce compared to those who experience the divorce of parents who
fight a lot," Booth told Reuters Health. "From the child's
perspective, there is no evidence that anything is drastically
wrong," he said in a statement.
In their second study Booth and Amato examined the factors that
influence divorce among parents in low-conflict relationships. The
authors found that these couples were less rooted in their communities
than similar couples who did not divorce. They were less likely to have
a network of friends or belong to religious organizations that may have
presented incentives to stay together, the authors explain. Low-conflict
couples who divorced were also less likely to own a home, moved more
often, and had fewer friends than those who remained married, the
authors report.
"With little encouragement or criticism, it's easier to get a
divorce," Booth said. "Both the personal commitment to a
marriage and barriers to leaving it are weak."
"The take home message is that if the marriage can't be preserved
until the child is a young adult, parents should make every effort to
ensure that their children's needs are given first priority when the
divorce occurs," Booth said.
SOURCE: Journal of Marriage and Family 2001;63:197-212.
Abused Boys More Likely to Hurt
Partner as Teens
Teenage boys who were abused as
children are more than three times as likely as other boys to use
physical violence against someone they are dating, study findings show.
These boys are also nearly three times as likely to threaten to harm
their dating partner, report researchers in the March issue of the
Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry.
The findings underscore the need for services that can help children
with histories of maltreatment, explain Dr. David A. Wolfe from the
University of Western Ontario in Canada, and colleagues.
"Education and early intervention concerning healthy, non-abusive
relationships through the school system may significantly reduce the
incidence of domestic violence and, in future generations, child abuse
and neglect," Wolfe told Reuters Health.
Children who have been physically, sexually or emotionally abused or
neglected learn to adapt by avoiding close relationships, learning to
distrust others and developing coping mechanisms such as fear and
anxiety.
"Such behaviors are indeed adaptive in childhood (because children)
get hurt less often but as they grow older these same behaviors lead to
peer problems, learning difficulties and relationship violence as a
victim, offender or both," Wolfe explained.
In the study, the researchers interviewed more than 1,400 boys and girls
from 10 high schools in Canada.
One-third of the surveyed teens, who ranged in age from 14 to 19 years
old, reported that they were abused as children. Girls with a history of
abuse were more likely to be angry, depressed and anxious. They were
also about ten times more likely to report post-traumatic stress-related
problems compared with girls who had not been abused, and to engage in
violent and non-violent delinquency. Boys with a history of abuse also
had higher levels of depression and post-traumatic stress but they were
less likely than girls exhibit delinquent behavior.
Their findings point to important gender differences that can result
from abuse, the authors conclude. They also note that it is not clear
how often teens who are violent or threatening in relationships continue
that behavior into adulthood.
"Although abusive behavior toward dating partners in adolescence
may not yet fully reflect adult-like patterns of violence, the
transition from adolescent dating violence to adult abusive behavior
warrants further investigation," the researchers conclude.
SOURCE: Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent
Psychiatry 2001;40:282-289.
UN Body Reports on Drug Abuse Trends
The widespread overuse of
controlled drugs such as benzodiazepines and various amphetamine-type
stimulants to treat psychological problems continues to be a growing
socially accepted habit, warns the annual report of the International
Narcotics Control Board (INCB), released this Wednesday.
The International Narcotics Control Board (INCB), whose members are
elected by the UN Economic and Social Council, is a UN-funded body with
the responsibility to promote government compliance with the
international drug control treaties and to assist them in this effort.
"Loose regulation, unreliable estimates and information as regards
actual medical needs of controlled drugs, coupled with aggressive
marketing techniques, improper or even unethical prescription practices
together add to a situation of easy availability of psychotropic
substances in especially, but not only, the developed countries,"
says the INCB.
Regarding abuse of illicit drugs, the INCB points out that the problem
appears to be on the rise in most countries of Africa while drug
availability is increasing in Europe. While the rate of cocaine abuse
among adolescents has declined by 14% from 1998-1999 in the US, in
Canada drug abuse among secondary school students is showing an increase
according to some surveys.
Also, "Cultivation of highly potent cannabis, hydroponically grown,
is spreading in Canada and parts of the US and continues to constitute a
major concern to law enforcement authorities," says the INCB
report.
"MDMA (Ecstasy) of western European origin is increasingly being
abused by young people in North America," according to the report.
There has been a sharp increase in the seizures of Ecstasy in the US in
2000, says the INCB.
The report also describes the growing traffic in drugs over the
Internet. With 600 million internet users at present and growing, the
INCB has urged governments to enact legislation to control online
pharmacies and drug stores that illegally supply controlled narcotic
drugs and psychotropic substances without requiring prescriptions.
Ecstasy Blamed in Rising Number of Car
Accidents
More young adults in the US
appear to be using the drug Ecstasy, which in turn appears to be
contributing to a growing number of auto accidents.
"Originally it was predominantly imported from Europe. But now
there is evidence that more and more of it is being synthesized in the
United States," Dr. Barry Logan of the Director of the Forensic
Laboratory Services Bureau in Washington State told attendees of the
53rd annual meeting of the American Academy of Forensic Sciences here
Monday.
Evidence from many different sources suggests that usage of the drug is
increasing dramatically in some cities across the United States and that
the drug is now beginning to be used by younger people. More teenagers
between the ages of 15 and 18 years appear to be experimenting with
Ecstasy than ever before, researchers say.
Ecstasy is also known as MDMA (methylenedioxymethamphetamine). Taken in
pill form, the drug usually produces sensations such as euphoria and
enhanced self-confidence one to two hours after ingestion. Ecstasy's
effects can last anywhere from 4 to 24 hours, Logan noted.
"A person who is impaired by their Ecstasy use can be just as
intoxicated as somebody who has taken alcohol," he explained in an
interview with Reuters Health. "Our experience is still rather
limited...but we are seeing increased accidents due to Ecstasy
use."
Logan said that even in very low doses the drug can affect concentration
and driving ability.
"People on the drug feel more powerful and they will have a
tendency to drive faster," said Dr. Paul Forne of the University of
Paris. "Everybody knows that driving under the influence of alcohol
is dangerous and that people know when they are drunk. But that is not
the case with MDMA and that is why it is important for us to give
politicians and the police the information that driving under the
influence of MDMA is also dangerous."
Forne told Reuters Health that public education campaigns are needed in
the United States as well as in many European countries where Ecstasy
use is also on the rise. Warning individuals that Ecstasy and driving
can be a potentially deadly mix should become a top priority, he said.
SOURCE: Reuters Health and American Academy of Forensic Sciences
Obesity Linked to Asthma in UK
Children
There appears to be a positive
association between body mass index (BMI) and asthma symptoms in
children, UK researchers report in the February issue of Thorax.
Dr. Jose I. Figueroa-Munoz and colleagues, from King's College, London,
note that previous studies of obesity and asthma in children generally
have had shortcomings, including being small and using
"unsound" methodology.
To investigate the association further, the researchers conducted a
cross-sectional analysis of data from 14,908 children (aged 4 to 11
years). The children involved were from Scottish and English
representative samples and from an English inner city sample.
Among factors included in the analyses were the relationship between
asthma symptoms and BMI and measures based on the sum of triceps and
subscapular skinfold thickness.
Obesity, based on BMI, was associated with asthma attacks and wheeze.
However, skinfold thickness showed no such relationship in most
analyses.
In addition, say the investigators, the asthma and BMI association
"was stronger in girls than in boys in the inner city sample, but
less convincingly in the representative sample."
The researchers point out that BMI appears to be a better measure than
skinfold thickness in such studies, and conclude that on this basis,
"there is clear evidence that fatness is associated with asthma in
children."
Nevertheless, Dr. Figueroa-Munoz, told Reuters Health, "as our
study was cross-sectional, we cannot determine the direction of the
association. Is obesity a risk factor for asthma or do asthmatic
children become overweight and obese more than nonasthmatic
children?"
Should obesity precede asthma, he added, appropriate studies should be
carried out "to determine whether the prevention of obesity in
children will have an impact on the development of asthma and asthma
symptoms."
SOURCE: Thorax
2001;56:133-137.
Drug Addiction Demystified Through the
Genome Map
Knowledge gained from the human
genome-mapping project is leading to a better understanding of how drugs
and alcohol act on the molecular and cellular mechanisms and brain
pathways to cause addiction, a University of Texas Southwestern Medical
Center at Dallas researcher and his colleague say.
Drs. Eric J. Nestler and David Landsman reported on the progress made in
the field of drug addiction in the February 15 issue of Nature, which is
dedicated to results of genome research and gains to be expected.
Nestler, a world-renowned molecular psychiatrist specializing in the
mechanisms of alcohol and drugs in the brain, is chairman of psychiatry
at UT Southwestern. Landsman is a leading authority on bioinformatics at
the National Center for Biotechnology Information, National Library of
Medicine, in Bethesda, Maryland.
In the essay, the authors stressed that addiction represents a
biological process caused by the effects of repeated drug exposure on a
vulnerable brain and defined it as the compulsive seeking and taking of
a drug or alcohol despite adverse consequences.
"The decoding of the human genome will prove incredibly important
in all areas of human research, none more so than in alcohol and drug
addiction," Nestler said. "In order to understand addiction,
it is important to define the types of molecular and cellular
adaptations at the levels of neurons and synapses that account for
tolerance, sensitization and dependence, terms that are often used to
define an addicted state."
The authors explain that genome sequencing — both in humans and in
other mammals — will foster an understanding of the biology of
addiction by enabling researchers to identify specific genes that
contribute to individual addiction risk as well as those involved
directly in the addiction process caused by drugs.
Nestler said addiction researchers have come to believe that drugs of
abuse act on brain circuits developed at a much earlier time. These
circuits are a part of the limbic system, located in the frontal lobe
and thought to be associated with emotions. Researchers think these
circuits regulate individual responses to such things as food, sex, or
risk-taking activities, all of which may act as "natural
reinforcers." Thus, the addict can become "addicted" to
things other than drugs.
"The loss of control that addicts show with respect to drug seeking
and taking may relate to the ability of drugs of abuse to commandeer
these natural-reward circuits and disrupt a person's motivation and
drive for normal reinforcers," Nestler said.
He said there is scientific evidence that "natural
addictions," such as overeating, pathological gambling, compulsive
shopping, and perhaps excessive exercise, may involve analogous
mechanisms to the chemical kind.
Nestler said that a major focus in addiction research today is exploring
the neurobiology of such addictive conditions. He explained that both
the person's intense cravings for the drug, as well as the increased
risk of relapse the person experiences, make it clear that major changes
have taken place in the brain. "The molecular and cellular
adaptations related to tolerance, sensitization (increased sensitivity),
and dependence do not persist long enough to account for the more
permanent behavioral changes associated with addiction," he said.
He said that this kind of change may well be associated with memory
and/or learning behavior, "but little information is available
concerning the molecular and cellular basis of essentially life-long
memories. Proposed changes in the conversational connections between
nerve cells or chromosomal organization remain speculative."
Nestler added that many changes taking place after multiple drug
exposure have now been uncovered.
"Because of such major gains like the genome project, today DNA
technology makes it possible to investigate thousands of gene products
simultaneously after drug exposure. Soon, by combining new genetic tools
with increasingly sophisticated models of addiction in animals, it will
be possible to identify patterns of altered gene expression that are
associated with particular features of the addicted state, such as
tolerance, sensitization, dependence, craving, and relapse," he
said.
SOURCE: Nature. 2001;409(6822):000-000
Parents` Bad Marriage Doesn`t Always
Doom Romance
Just because your parents had a
terrible marriage, it doesn't mean you should resign yourself to a
similar fate, researchers report.
Investigators found that young adults tend to be more successful in
their romantic relationships if their parents were warm and supportive
toward them while growing up, regardless of the relationship the parents
had.
The findings "go against the common idea that we learn to relate to
our partners by watching our parents relate with each other," Rand
D. Conger, of Iowa State University's Institute for Social and
Behavioral Research, said in a statement.
"Children appear to mimic the way their parents behave towards
children, not the way parents behave towards each other," he told
Reuters Health. This means that "having parents involved in a
miserable marriage doesn't mean you're doomed to having a miserable
marriage yourself," he added. It also suggests that children from
single-parent families may do just as well in romance as those from
two-parent families, according to the report published in the Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology.
Conger explained that "those doing well in early adult romantic
relationships are those who were taught by their parents how to treat
other people well."
Conger and colleagues annually videotaped the family interactions
between a group of adolescents, their parents and their siblings when
the adolescents were in grades 7 through 10. They conducted similar
video-taped sessions 5 years later to observe the interactions between
these individuals, now in their 20s, and their current romantic
partners.
The data, compiled from 193 individuals observed over 11 years, suggests
that "the competence of these young people was most enhanced by
effective parenting practices," Conger said.
These practices include being supportive, showing minimal hostility and
anger, effectively monitoring their children, paying attention to good
behaviors, and providing appropriate consequences for misbehaviors.
"Kids grow up with the least damage if the parenting environment
remains sound and effective," Conger noted. Even when parents are
in conflict, children can learn how to appropriately treat others when
good parenting practices are employed.
SOURCE: Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
How to Help Teen Parents Succeed
Sometimes teen parents need help getting on their feet and other times
their problems can be more serious, while still others may seem to have
everything under control.
Since most teen parents will be in contact with a pediatrician--either
the doctor they have visited since they themselves were in diapers, or
their child's doctor-- a pediatricians' organization has issued new
guidelines on how to help those who have become parents before they
themselves may have fully grown up.
In 1997, over 489,000 children were born to young women between the ages
of 15 and 19 in the United States, according to the report.
"Certainly the issue of teenage pregnancy is a very controversial
issue that our society has been struggling to deal with for decades,
both in terms of trying to prevent unintended pregnancy but also to be
able to provide optimal care," says David W. Kaplan, MD, MPH, chair
of the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) Committee on Adolescence,
one of two committees that authored the statement.
The new statement updates an older one written in 1989, Kaplan says.
Between then and now, more long-term research has been done on teen
parents and their children, more comprehensive programs have been
developed to help these families, and a number of new contraceptives
have been introduced. The report has specific suggestions for mothers in
particular, as well as some for teen fathers.
Pediatricians can be real advocates for teen parents' needs, Kaplan
says. For instance, teen mothers who attend regular high school can have
a hard time, which can range from finding childcare during the day to
making time for homework at night. "Oftentimes a pediatrician can
be very helpful in working with a school," he says, to help school
officials offer additional assistance teen parents might need. Helping
teen parents complete their education is crucial, he says.
Not all teen parents will feel comfortable going to their child's
pediatrician for their own checkups, but often that can be an ideal
situation, Kaplan says. Still, "even if the pediatrician were not
providing care for the teenager, he or she is still going to be an
advocate for the infant" and would be well aware of the problems
facing the mother, he says.
A very careful assessment of the teen parent's individual situation is
vital, says child psychiatrist Elizabeth Berger, MD. "Teen parents
are not all the same," she says.
While Berger stresses that not all teens are unprepared when it comes to
parenting, some may not be ready for the new role and may not fully
understand what it requires. They may have very mixed feelings about the
arrival of the baby.
As a result, many adults, such as the teen's parents, relatives, and
older acquaintances, may try to offer help. But it can be hard to know
when to offer how much.
"Many young parents really do need all kinds of help," she
says, such as respite from the demands of parenting, time for their own
personal growth and development, and even cold, hard cash.
Sensitivity and tact are key when dealing with teen parents, Berger
says. Maintain a respect for the teen's role as parent, and don't be
condescending: Keep in mind that parents, no matter what age, generally
know what is best for their child, she says.
Preventing teen pregnancies in the first place and helping teen parents
avoid a second one if they aren't ready are other goals, Kaplan says,
but he says it's not as easy as prescribing the Pill or passing out
condoms.
Berger agrees. "I am a firm believer that accidental pregnancy is
not accidental," she says, since it often reflects something going
on in the parents' lives.
Berger says broad social change is what is really needed to deal with
all the problems of teen parenthood. A drive toward more personal
medical care is a start, she says, and it is happening. She points to
how doctors now often ask women if they have been exposed to domestic
violence.
"Understanding the reality that the patient is working within is
really the first piece of being able to offer something of value to
them," Berger says. But few health professionals and community
leaders actually have the time to sit down with a teen parent and try
and minister to a teen's real needs. "It's everybody's job, and
it's nobody's job," she says.
Teen parents' success often depends on the community, Kaplan says, and
help from the community is often lacking. "I think communities
really need to look at what kinds of services might be available to this
population and then if there really isn't anything then they should
really consider getting something started," he says.
SOURCE: The recommendation from Kaplan's committee and the AAP Committee
on Early Childhood, Adoption and Dependent Care appears in the February
issue of the journal Pediatrics.
Ever-Younger Puberty Puzzles Researchers
Scientists have known for several years that girls and boys are reaching puberty earlier, but they still don't know why this is happening, or what the consequences might be, experts said at a forum here Monday. In 1997, a landmark study of 17,000 girls found that the average starting age of puberty had dipped a year from previous studies of Caucasian girls, to 9.7 years.
African-American girls hit puberty even earlier, at an average age of about 8, said Marcia Herman-Giddens, principal author of that study and a professor at the University of North at Carolina Chapel Hill.
Data on when puberty starts has been skimpy over the years--especially for African Americans. But, said Herman-Giddens, "I'm confident that this trend is a real trend," adding that adolescence seems to be starting earlier and lasting longer in children worldwide. She is currently analyzing data on American boys.
"What we're seeing is a symptom of a very serious public health problem," said Herman-Giddens, noting that the long term physical and mental health impact of early puberty are not understood.
Being obese or overweight, which has been associated with premature puberty, may be one potential cause. Others include genetics, low birthweight, poor diet, lack of activity, and surprisingly, an absentee father or a non-relative male in the house have also been offered as explanations.
Scientists have also been exploring whether so-called "endocrine disrupters"--a group of chemicals thought to interfere with hormonal function--might be spurring or delaying puberty, said
Herman-Giddens.
John Peterson Myers, director of the W. Alton Jones Foundation and author of a book on chemical contamination and fetal development, said some of these chemicals have retarded sexual development in rat fetuses.
Among the most controversial of these chemicals are phthalate esters, which are found in toys, vinyl flooring, detergents, and cosmetics and lotions. The chemical and cosmetics industry says phthalates have been proven safe and that they have no role in causing early puberty.
"The science is not certain, but there is a plausible link," contends Myers.
Diana Zuckerman, executive director of the National Center for Policy Research for Women & Families, said she worries about the psychological impact of early puberty on young girls.
Previous studies have shown that girls who develop at a young age begin dating earlier, have sex sooner, are subject to more psychological stress, more behavioral problems, and were more likely to drink and smoke, said Zuckerman.
"No matter what they look like, they are still little girls," she said. Zuckerman also added that early puberty places additional stress on parents who have to explain sexuality at a younger age.
SOURCE:
Reuters Health
No Evidence of an Autism `Epidemic`
Reports that there is an "epidemic" of autism and similar
pervasive developmental disorders (PDDs) in the US and elsewhere are
unfounded and likely due to misinterpretations of data, according to a
new report.
"People tend to confuse two different things," explains Eric
Fombonne, MD, a fellow of the Royal College of Psychologists, as well as
reader in epidemiological child psychiatry and a consultant in the
Pervasive Developmental Disorder Clinic at the Maudsley Hospital in
London. Fombonne is author of a commentary on the topic in the February
issue of the journal Pediatrics.
"In epidemiology we use two different measures of disease
occurrence in the population. One is prevalence and one is
incidence," he says. In other words, just counting how many people
have autism and PDDs does not account for other factors, some as simple
as an overall increase in population.
"If you look at that, and only that, indeed the prevalence estimate
that we have in most countries at the moment for autism and PDDs are
much higher than used to be the case 20 years ago, and even more than 40
years ago. So people have used this increase in the prevalence rates as
evidence that the incidence of autism is rising," Fombonne says.
"That is the wrong interpretation of the findings of
prevalence."
The fact that more people are formally diagnosed with autism than 20 or
40 years ago--rather than the fact that more people actually have the
disorder--is one reason for the increase, he says. The guidelines used
for diagnosing disorders of this kind have gone through several changes
in the past 20 years, making the definition of PDDs broader. This can
mean that a person diagnosed with a PDD by one set of guidelines may not
have the disorder when diagnosed by different criteria, and vice versa.
Diagnosis of children at younger ages can also affect the number of
overall cases.
One set of data that has received considerable attention--some of it
through "misuse" of the information, as Fombonne writes in the
commentary--was a 1999 report from California's Department of
Developmental Services. "It just shows that there are more children
which are identified in the system in California, but there are many
reasons for which that may be the case," he says.
"There are absolutely no grounds to claim there is an epidemic,
that there is something going on. I think what is happening is just that
their system is catching up with children which were not detected
before, and because of the increased awareness of autism people are
looking for more services, they bring their children for assessment at a
much earlier age, and all these facts are sufficient to explain the
apparent increase in California," he says.
Some people, he notes, have used the California report to link autism
with the MMR vaccine, the combination measles-mumps-rubella vaccine
generally given to children between the ages of 13 and 18 months--around
the time when many parents first begin to notice symptoms of PDDs in
their children. Widespread use of the MMR vaccine in children began
around the 1980s, about the time autism cases appeared to increase.
The connection in time between the two events does not mean that there
is a causal connection, Fombonne says. The argument that the two are
connected is "absolutely fraught with errors of reasoning," he
says. Further research in the area has not proven any link, he adds.
Some parents of autistic children have inquired about the possible role
of MMR in their child's development of autism, Fombonne says, but most
believe, as many researchers do, that there is a strong genetic
propensity toward autism and PDDs.
"Autism is such a distressing disorder that I understand parents
who are very willing to explain this very puzzling problem with anything
they can," he says.
When the California report came out, it received a lot of attention,
agrees Bruce G. Gellin, MD, MPH, assistant professor in the department
of pediatrics at Vanderbilt University and executive director of the
National Network for Immunization Information (NNII). While the report
cautiously stated that it did not indicate that the incidence of autism
in the population had increased, some people still interpreted it that
way, he says.
Gellin points to one chart from the California report that he says is
particularly misleading. It measures the number of persons enrolled in
California autism programs since the early 1960s on one axis, with the
year of their birth on the other. The line moves sharply upward between
the years 1980 and 1989--to show that more people born in those years
were diagnosed and recognized as having autism as those who were older.
Fombonne also included the chart in his commentary.
"It's important for people to understand what numbers actually
mean," Gellin says, and not be swayed by charts presented in a
misleading way--not necessarily by the authors of the original report,
but by those who use it to defend a link between autism and vaccines,
for instance.
"As with any question and concern, you can only make good decisions
if you have good information," Gellin says.
The NNII is a partnership of professional medical societies dedicated to
providing reliable information on vaccines and immunization policies and
practices, Gellin says. More information on vaccines and immunization,
and the autism question, is available on the NNII
Web site.
SOURCE: February 2001 issue of Pediatrics
TV Viewing Not the Best Cure for Bored
Young Patients
For children, spending time in
the hospital can mean long, boring hours spent in bed, so many young
patients turn to the television for relief. But the American Academy of
Pediatrics warns that television can promote dangerous behavior in
youngsters.
The group urges pediatricians and hospitals to remove TV sets from their
waiting rooms and to develop special programming for children, as well
as to screen stations for violent, sexually explicit and potentially
upsetting shows.
The recommendation is part of an updated statement on children,
adolescents and television by the American Academy of Pediatrics.
"TV is perhaps the most powerful teacher kids will ever have,"
Dr. Victor Strasburger, one of the report's authors and a professor at
the University of New Mexico in Albuquerque, told Reuters Health.
"It is hypocritical for us to criticize parents for not getting the
TV out of their children's bedroom while it is blaring loud and clear in
waiting rooms and hospital rooms."
According to the statement published in the February issue of
Pediatrics, nearly one third of 2- to 7-year-olds and nearly two thirds
of 8- to 18-year-olds have a TV set in their bedroom.
"Parents have no right to criticize their kids' bad language or
aggressive behavior if they are going to allow them to have a TV in
their bedroom," Strasburger said.
Other recommendations encourage parents to use the v-chip and the
ratings system to screen programs. The v-chip, which is installed in
most new television sets, allows parents to block out certain shows. The
ratings system tells parents whether a show contains violence, sexual
content or offensive language.
According to the report, the average child or teen watches nearly 3
hours of television a day. Educating parents and children on the power
of the media can reduce violence and substance abuse among adolescents,
the report indicates. Many such programs are now routinely offered in
early elementary schools nationwide.
"Children and adolescents are particularly vulnerable to the
messages conveyed through television, which influence their perceptions
and behaviors," the statement explains. "Many younger children
cannot discriminate between what they see and what is real."
SOURCE: Pediatrics 2001;107:423-426.
Sleepy Children at Risk of
Injury
Young children who miss naps and
lack sleep may be more prone to accidental injury, according to Italian
researchers.
The investigators found that sleeping less than 10 hours a day including
naps put children at an 86% higher risk of injuries caused by accidents
such as slipping, tripping or falling.
Especially vulnerable were children aged 3 to 5, Dr. Francesca Valent of
the University of Udine and colleagues report. And boys in particular
saw their injury risk increase by up to four times if they had been
awake for at least 8 hours straight.
The researchers evaluated the sleeping habits of 311 children who came
into an emergency department to be treated for an accidental injury.
Parents filled out a questionnaire that included the numbers of hours
the child slept, hour-by-hour, in the 2 days before their injury. The
researchers' aim was to compare sleeping patterns on a day when no
injury occurred, with sleep on the day of the injury.
"Overall, more children had longer hours of sleep" 2 days
prior to their injury compared with the 24 hours before the injury,
Valent and colleagues report. Their findings are published in the
February online issue of the journal Pediatrics.
"It makes sense and seems logical that little kids are more prone
to accidents when they are not getting enough sleep," Dr. George
Cohen, a spokesperson for the American Academy of Pediatrics, told
Reuters Health.
Boys also tend to be more likely to be physically careless--like jumping
off a chair or wrestling with other children--explained Cohen. "So
the result that boys may be more vulnerable to accidents when they are
tired is not surprising," he said.
However, Cohen noted that the study identified only a small difference
in sleep--about 20 minutes--between the well-rested period 2 days before
the injury and the "sleep-deprived" period just prior to
visiting the emergency department.
"This makes it harder to draw many specific conclusions from the
study," Cohen said.
SOURCE: Pediatrics 2001;107:e23.
Adult-Type Diabetes Developing in
Children
The incidence of type 2 diabetes
has been increasing in children at an alarming rate, especially in those
who are obese and have a strong family history of type 2 diabetes,
according to Kenneth Lee Jones, MD, a leading childhood diabetes expert
who spoke today at an American Medical Association media briefing on
advances in diabetes treatment and care. Type 2 diabetes primarily
affects obese adults.
"About 10 years ago, some of us started seeing what we thought was
type 2 diabetes in obese Mexican-American and African-American children
with diabetes in their families," said Dr. Jones, professor of
pediatrics at the University of California, San Diego. "When we
treated them for type 1 diabetes, the only diabetes previously
recognized in children, their response was different from the typical
child with type 1 who is insulin deficient. The children with type 2
diabetes were insulin resistant and treating them with insulin resulted
in weight gain which worsened the insulin resistance."
Previously considered an adult disease, type 2 diabetes begins as an
insulin-resistant condition, with comorbidities in addition to high
blood glucose that must be addressed, such as abnormalities of blood
lipids, high blood pressure, and coagulation disorders that are risk
factors for cardiovascular disease. Often children with type 2 diabetes
also present with acanthosis nigricans. In addition, the question of
when to intervene in dyslipidemia, hypertension, and coagulation
disorders is also a consideration in treating children with type 2
diabetes.
Dr. Jones continued, "As a nation, we are all getting obese and it
is starting in childhood. One of the major consequences of this is that
more and more of our children will develop type 2 diabetes," he
said. "This is a major public health problem and we are going to
have to make major lifestyle changes to prevent it. This will not be
easy and will resemble the problem society has faced with lung cancer
and smoking. We need to change very basic aspects of our lifestyle, how
we eat, what we eat, the amount we eat, and how much we exercise."
Most practitioners who see children for medical problems, including
diabetes, were told throughout their training that type 2 diabetes does
not exist in children. As a result, they are hesitant to consider this
or make it the initial diagnosis, Dr. Jones observed.
"Physicians are also facing a treatment dilemma in type 2 diabetes
in children. Will the same medications used in treating type 2 diabetes
in adults work as safely and efficaciously in children; are the same
treatment strategies appropriate?" questioned Dr. Jones. "In
adults, the treatment traditionally has started with suggested lifestyle
change: increase your activity, change your diet and lose weight. In my
experience, this has not been terribly effective for adolescents."
Dr. Jones announced that metformin, a drug frequently used in adults
with diabetes, is both safe and effective in children. He was the
principal investigator on the first study evaluating metformin as a
therapy for children. The paper has been submitted for publication, and
Dr. Jones reported the abstract reporting the results was well received
at the American Diabetes Association meeting last June.
"I predict that in a few years we will have found that many of the
diabetes drugs currently used for adults are efficacious and safe for
use in children and that treatment strategies used in adults with type 2
diabetes will prove appropriate for children as well," Dr. Jones
predicted. However, he emphasized that the most important role for the
pediatrician is in promoting prevention through reducing obesity,
increasing physicial activity, and improving eating habits in young
patients. In addition, the support and good example of parents is
essential.
SOURCE: American Medical Association media briefing
Study Casts Doubt on Gateway Theory
Researchers say that today's
young people who use marijuana are not likely to become hard drug users
when they get older, the Associated Press reported Feb. 1. According to
the report, people born after the 1960s are less likely than baby
boomers to go from using marijuana to heroin and other hard drugs.
"The drug subculture among inner city youth today encourages
marijuana use but discourages use of hard drugs," said Andrew Golub
of the National Development and Research Institute, the study's main
author. "Many of these kids witnessed the devastating effects of
crack and heroin on their own families and neighborhoods."
Golub and his team of researchers examined data about adolescent drug
use reported by more than 100,000 people who participated in the
government's annual National Household Survey on Drug Abuse between 1979
and 1997.
The private study challenges the "gateway" theory of drug
abuse, which states that those who use marijuana are more likely to use
cocaine, crack, or heroin.
Bob Weiner, spokesman for the Office of National Drug Control Policy,
said he had doubts about Golub's conclusions. Weiner cited recent
research that showed young people who regularly use marijuana are 80
times more likely to use cocaine. "The parents of the children who
have gone on to cocaine would have more common sense than his findings
seem to come out with," Weiner said.
SOURCE: February2001 edition of the American Journal of Public
Health.
Can Ads Aimed at Thrill-Seeking Teens
Cut Down on Marijuana Use?
More kids are saying 'No' to
marijuana, thanks to an intensive television campaign targeting teens
classified as "high sensation-seekers."
Sensation seeking, researchers have found, is a type of personality that
requires constant stimulation from new and risky things. Experts say
teens that score high on sensation seeking are more likely to use drugs
than other kids.
Anti-drug messages aimed at thrill seekers are more effective than more
generalized campaigns for adolescents, says Philip Palmgreen, professor
of communications at the University of Kentucky. "If you aim
[messages] to the low sensation-seekers, you are preaching to the
converted," he says. "They're extremely unlikely to become
drug users."
Palmgreen and his colleagues tested the effectiveness of televised
public service announcements (PSAs) targeted at sensation seekers in
Fayette County, Kentucky and in Knox County, Tennessee. Before, during
and after airing the PSAs, investigators randomly interviewed a
different set of 100 young people from each county every month to
determine marijuana use (32 months, approximately 6,400 kids overall).
After the ads ran for 4 months in Fayette County only, the survey found
pot use dropped in Fayette County, but continued to go up in Knox
County. Investigators then ran the PSAs for another 4 months in both
counties, and found pot use fell in both areas.
A few months after the PSA campaign in Knox County, researchers found a
26.7% drop in marijuana use. The decrease in Fayette County was
reportedly even more dramatic--about 40%--since two separate TV
campaigns ran in that area.
The results show how effective media campaigns targeted at sensation
seekers can be, says Palmgreen. "Anti-drug media campaigns using
televised ads alone can actually affect drug use behavior and reduce
it," he says.
Although experts such as those at the Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention (CDC) have long backed multi-faceted programs, Palmgreen says
his research is the first scientific study to show that televised
anti-drug PSAs on their own "can actually affect drug use and
reduce it."
The TV ads aimed at thrill-seeking teens were 30-second mini-dramas
aired during hours when such teens were thought to be watching. The
mini-dramas relayed the consequences of marijuana use, such as getting
into trouble with the law, damaging relationships with parents, friends,
girlfriends and boyfriends, and affecting performance in school, on jobs
and in sports.
At least one expert doubts that this particular TV campaign will have
lasting success.
High sensation-seeking people "are after novelty and excessive
arousal so telling them, 'Gee, you're not going to perform well in
school' is no big deal, or that '[marijuana use] is going to affect your
relationship with your parents'--that's no big deal," says Bernardo
Carducci, PhD, professor of psychology and director of the Shyness
Research Institute at Indiana University Southeast.
What will work with thrill-seeking people, says Carducci, is providing
them with an alternative that will satisfy their craving for variety and
stimulation. He recommends encouraging kids to participate in
afterschool programs, taking them on trips, or having them take on
part-time jobs.
"We need to provide these kids with the stimulation that they are
seeking elsewhere that's destructive," adds Carducci.
SOURCE: February 2001 issue of the American Journal of Public Health.
Daytime Wetting Is Common in Young
Schoolchildren
The embarrassing problem of
"having an accident" in school occurs among young children
more often than teachers and professionals may realize, Australian
researchers report.
And although parents may be aware of their child's daytime wetting
problem, many fail to seek medical attention.
In a survey of 1,419 Australian first-graders, investigators found that
while teachers report that 3% of children wet their pants during the
day, parents claim more than 19% have the problem. Over 4% of children
wet themselves more than once a month, according to the report by
Premala Sureshkumar of Royal Alexandra Hospital for Children in Sydney
and colleagues. Their findings are published in a recent issue of The
Journal of Pediatrics.
"This is truly a physical problem that can be dealt with much more
effectively from that perspective," commented Dr. Steven G. Docimo,
director of pediatric urology at Children's Hospital in Pittsburgh.
"(We need) to get away from the notion that this is a behavioral
problem."
Children in the study with moderate to severe and even mild urinary
incontinence associated symptoms such as sudden urgency, dribbling,
squatting, and bed-wetting with their condition.
The investigators also found that recent emotional stress, a family
history of wetting (especially in the father's family), and a fear of
school or home toilets increased the risk of daytime wetting.
Almost 28% of mild daytime wetting could be attributed to these factors,
the report indicates.
Previous studies from Denmark and Sweden claim that at least 1 in 10
school-age children have a problem wetting their pants, according to
Docimo.
"I think it's very important for teachers to understand that this
is a physical problem; that it is not an uncommon physical problem, and
that it is a very embarrassing problem," Docimo told Reuters
Health.
"They really should respond to it with understanding, with trying
to get the child into a situation where as few of their peers as
possible are aware that they had this problem," he added.
Teachers can also play a big role in helping solve daytime wetting
problems, he suggested, by helping facilitate timed voiding regimens--a
common treatment recommendation. Setting up a system such as this where
the child has breaks at various times of the day to go to the bathroom
often prevents further accidents, Docimo explained.
In the study, only 16% of parents pursued medical attention for their
child's problem, according to the Australian researchers.
Docimo emphasizes to parents, however, that oftentimes something can be
done.
Daytime wetting can be associated with urinary infections, uncontrolled
bladder contractions, and high-pressure voiding. New therapies can
retrain and relax children's pelvic muscles to help control bladder
reflexes, Docimo pointed out.
"One of the reasons why parents haven't sought medical attention
for this problem is that we (as doctors) haven't dealt with it very
well," Docimo said.
"I think that we really are getting better at dealing with this as
physicians," he added. "Pediatric urologists are devoting a
tremendous amount of attention to this area right now, and so there may
be more reason to seek medical attention now than in the past."
SOURCE: The Journal of Pediatrics 2000;137:814-818.
___
|