NUMBER 803 • 10 AUGUST • INCLUSION
INDEX

    

Young children can only be truly included if their educators understand their needs, and how to meet such needs through practices which aspire to excellence. For inclusion is about much more than location — it is more than simply “being” in a setting — it is about making sure that young children and their families are offered opportunity fully to participate in events and developments. And this is, alas, easier said than done. Despite the increasingly shared political agenda for social inclusion, there remain barriers to inclusion which have yet to be overcome. Four key themes which cross geographical and cultural borders — seem to us to dominate the literature:

  • There is an evident climate of policy change towards inclusion across Europe (and)
  • A multinational commitment towards (and inclusive response to) education of children with learning difficulties has been established (but)
  • A commonality of concern exists about the education of children with emotional and behavioural difficulties and
  • Inclusive ideologies continue to be discussed and promoted whilst, at the same time, exclusive practices continue. (Nutbrown & Clough, 2004, p. 306)

In two recent studies of educators' attitudes to inclusion, we found that although many practitioners espoused a pro-inclusive policy rhetoric, in reality they maintained reservations based on: the needs of the children they were seeking to include; the responses of parents; their own level of professional knowledge, and the level and quality of support they were offered to make inclusion of children with particular needs a reality (Clough & Nutbrown, 2004; Nutbrown & Clough, 2004).

Participants from a range of settings and policy contexts generally supported inclusion but with important reservations; the “Yes-but … ” factor that we identified highlights the mismatch between policy and practical realities — between the willingness to include all children, in principle, and the ability to cater appropriately for the diverse and sometimes demanding needs of young children. For example, two of the early years practitioners we interviewed commented:

(It) … depends on the degree of the condition the children have. A child who has mobility problems could not pose any insurmountable problems, but a child with severe autism would be too disruptive and would affect the learning process for the rest of the children.

Children should be included, provided that there is adequate teaching support available to enable all class members to receive equal attention during lessons. It (inclusion) should promote tolerance in children without disability and enhance learning in those with a disability.

However important are the views of practitioners, Kilpatrick and Hunter (2005) remind us — in their review of inclusive education principles and practices in Northern Ireland — that various “layers” of inclusion must be peeled back to truly understand inclusion from a child's viewpoint. They argue that only when children's perspectives are understood, can an education system be truly inclusive.
Perhaps some aspects of inclusion can be summed up in this comment from a teacher working in Northern Ireland who, reflecting on views of childhood said:

Little children are so at risk aren't they? It's such a responsibility to try to protect them from all sorts of horrors, we have to try to do that for all of them in the early years  — Special needs or not. (Clough & Nutbrown, 2004, p. 203)

 


PETER CLOUGH  and CATHY NUTBROWN
Clough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2005). Inclusion and Development in the Early Years: Making Inclusion Conventional? Foreword in Child Care in Practice Vol. 11, No.2, April 2005, pp. 99-102

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References:

Clough, P., & Nutbrown, C. (2004). Special educational needs and inclusion: multiple perspectives from preschool educators in the UK. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 2(2),191-210.

Kilpatrick, R., & Hunter, J. (in press). Inclusion and special educational needs in Northern Ireland: peeling back the layers. In C. Donnelly, P. McKeown, & R. D. Osborne (Eds.), Devolution and pluralism in education in Northern Ireland. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

Nutbrown, C., & Clough, P. (2004). Inclusion and exclusion in the early years: conversations with European educators. European Journal of Special Needs Education, 19(3), 301-315.

BACK