NUMBER 958 • 10 MAY • CARE LEAVERS
INDEX

     Numerous researchers in different societies have found that, in contrast to their peers, care leavers experience `compressed and accelerated transitions’ (Stein, 2002; see also, Fernandez del Valle et al., 1999; Panchon et al., 1999).

Young people leaving care have to cope with challenges and responsibilities of major changes in their Lives - leaving foster care and residential care and setting up home, leaving school and entering the world of work, (or more likely, being unemployed and surviving on benefits) and being parents - at a far younger age than other young people. In short they have compressed and accelerated transitions (Stein, 2002, p. 68).

In addition to the likelihood of accelerated transitions, care leavers may also have experienced other risk factors that render them more vulnerable to poor outcomes than their peers (Stein, 2002). The inability or failure of the care system to meet their needs may be one such factor. However, needs and risks may more closely relate to their whole life experience. For instance, Skuse and Ward (2003) argue that the generally poor outcomes for this group become more understandable and less pronounced when their experiences prior to entry and during their time in care are also considered. Professionals also identify the importance of taking account of factors including age at entry to care, reasons for admission and duration of the care episode when considering expectations about what constitutes a good outcome for an individual child (Bhabra and Ghate, 2002). At present there is little evidence of systematic information being collected that would demonstrate how far children placed away from home lag behind their peers at entry to care or accommodation.

The importance of taking account of previous experiences is demonstrated by findings from a number of studies that show how many young people consider they have benefited from being placed away from home. Skuse and Ward (2003) found that 72% of young people leaving care thought their lives would have been worse had they not been looked after. Similarly, research undertaken in Israel found that 80`X, of young people thought that residential care had been good for them (Schiff and Benbenishty, 2003). Over half of respondents in a study in the United States who had aged out of foster care also felt they had been lucky to have been placed away from home (Courtney et al., 2004).

Care leavers are not a homogenous group (Skuse and Ward, 2003) and poor outcomes of some can mask the successes of others. Stein (2002, 2004) has identified three groups: Young People moving on, who are able to put their past experiences behind them and welcome the challenge of moving towards independence; survivors, who may demonstrate continuing dependency on services, but who regard themselves as having been strengthened by the need to overcome numerous difficulties, and victims, whose experience of care has generally failed to help them overcome past difficulties, and who face independence with poor life chances. The challenge lies in reducing the proportion of care leavers who experience adverse outcomes and continuing social exclusion in adulthood.

 

 


EMILY MUNRO, MIKE STEIN, HARRIET WARD
Munro, E., Stein, M., & Ward, H. (2005) Comparing how different social, political and legal frameworks support or inhibit transitions from public care to independence in Europe, Israel, Canada and the United States. International Journal of Child and Family Welfare, Vol.8 No.4, pp. 197-198

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 References

Bhabra, S., and Ghate, D., (2002). Consultation analysis: Raising the educational attainment of children in care. London: Policy Research Bureau.

Courtney, M., Terao, S., & Bost, N. (2004) Midwest evaluation of the adult functioning of former foster youth: Conditions of youth preparing to leave state care. University of Chicago, Chapin Hall Center for Children.

Fernandez del Valle, J., Alvarex-Baz,E., Fernanz, A. (1999). A follow-up study of children after leaving residential care. Oviedo: Servicio de Publicaciones de Principado de Asturias.

Panchon, C., Fernandez del Valle, J., Vizcarro, C., Anton, V., & Martin, C. (1999). Adolescents from 16-18 in residential care. Madrid: Ministerio de Trabajo & Asuntos Sociales.

Schiff, M., & Benbenishty, R. (2003). Young adults alumni of group homes in Israel: A follow-up study. Israel: Hebrew University of Jerusalem.

Skuse, T., & Ward, H. (2003). Outcomes for looked after children: Children's views of care and accommodation. A draft interim report for the department of health. Loughborough: Centre for Child and Family Research: Loughborough University.

Stein, M. (2002). Leaving Care. In D. McNeish, t, Newman, & H. Roberts.
(Eds.), What works for children. UK: Open University.

Stein, M., & Baines, C. (2004). Safeguards for vulnerable children: Three studies on abusers, disabled children and children in prison. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.


BACK