CYC-Net

CYC-Net on Facebook CYC-Net on Twitter Search CYC-Net

Join Our Mailing List

Quote

Just a short piece ...

22 JULY 2009

NO 1464

Advocacy

Practising caseworkers are able to draw on a number of tools and techniques which may help to ensure that service users gain the maximum benefit from their intervention. Many professionals regard the advocacy role as a proper and relevant part of their professional life. It is common for social workers to challenge other agencies, such as a health authority, the Benefits Agency or a housing department. They may also find themselves advocating for a user within their own agency. Nurses have always felt that they are the patient's advocate when challenging doctors, especially where medical decisions have not taken account of a patient's lifestyle and personal needs or wishes.
There is a school of thought which questions the ability of professional service providers to provide effective advocacy. A number ofwriters have emphasized the need for absolute independence and refer to the many constraints within which professionals commonly work. They point to the need to follow agency procedures, to satisfy a manager that this is good use of their time and to remain credible with colleagues.

If the advocacy task involves challenging an employer or a colleague, it might be extremely difficult for them to pursue the cause with absolute loyalty to their partner. Even where the task involves challenging another professional agency, there may well be formal or informal reciprocal arrangements which hinder the advocacy role (Ivers 1994; Sang and O'Brien 1984).

However, the expanding social work role as care broker has caused some writers to think again and to suggest that the volunteer citizen advocacy role suffers from a fundamental weakness which has to do with the variety of skills and roles which it attempts to embrace (Bateman 1995). This writer firmly supports the idea that professionals can learn advocacy skills and suggests that it is an appropriate role for doctors, social workers, nurses, advice workers, members of the clergy, and housing and education officials.

Most professional organizations have been slow to define the advocacy role for their members, apart from the legal profession of course. The other exception is nursing, where the United Kingdom Code of Professional Conduct and the International Council of Nurses clearly expect nurses to act as advocates for their patients. This role was confirmed during interviews with nurses who point out their traditional role of advocate where patients might need to challenge the medical profession or community service providers (Ivers 1994). However, Bateman (1995) explains the difficulties faced by nurses when they attempt to challenge the power of a high status doctor.

In an evaluative study of a citizen advocacy scheme, it appeared that even if paid staff were aware that elderly people in their care had needs outside of those being provided, they might not have been able to establish what those needs were or to spend the necessary time in pursuing solutions (Ivers 1994).

The complex role of an advocate is remarked upon by Wolfensberger (1977), who divided it into two fairly distinct elements. One is being able to help their partner gain access to services and benefits, and the other is to become a warm, caring and supporting friend. If this dual role is accepted then professional advocates might well find themselves in some difficulties. The second element could extend the professional role into something unwieldy which might interfere with their commitment to other service users and to contractual requirements.

VERA IVERS

Ivers, V. (1988) Advocacy. Chapter in Craig, Y.J. (1988). Advocacy, Counselling and Mediation in Casework. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers. 27-28.

The International Child and Youth Care Network
THE INTERNATIONAL CHILD AND YOUTH CARE NETWORK (CYC-Net)

Registered Public Benefit Organisation in the Republic of South Africa (PBO 930015296)
Incorporated as a Not-for-Profit in Canada: Corporation Number 1284643-8

P.O. Box 23199, Claremont 7735, Cape Town, South Africa | P.O. Box 21464, MacDonald Drive, St. John's, NL A1A 5G6, Canada

Board of Governors | Constitution | Funding | Site Content and Usage | Advertising | Privacy Policy | Contact us

iOS App Android App