TRAINING 

Training Intervention Strategies to Promote Application of Ethics Learning in Practice Settings

Dale Curry

This is the final article of a series of seven articles focusing on ethics in child and youth care worker training and development. The previous articles provided an introduction to the National Staff Development and Training Association’s Code of Ethics for Training and Development Professionals and discussion regarding core values and principles and ethical responsibilities as professionals to clients, colleagues, the profession and society. The final two articles (including this article) focus on developing training intervention strategies to promote ethical practice on-the-job.

Baldwin and Ford (1988) present a useful framework for examining transfer of learning that can help to promote ethical competence in child and youth care practice situations. They emphasize the importance of individual trainee characteristics, the work environment, and the training design. This article will emphasize the training design component, but the reader should recognize the importance of individual and environmental factors in promoting or hindering ethical practice. For example, research consistently indicates a .30 to .40 correlation between individual cognitive moral development and ethical behavior (Wells & Schminke, 2001). Similarly, environmental factors such as organizational support, the organizational value of training, administrative support, supervisory support, coworker support, and opportunity to use training have been found to promote transfer of learning (Brittain, 2001; Curry, 1996; Holton, Bates, Seller, & Carvalho, 1997; Tracey, Tannenbaum, & Kavanagh, 1995). Effective interventions to promote ethical practice on-the-job will incorporate individual and organizational/environmental elements into the training design.

Training Design
A large body of research has been conducted on four areas of training design (identical elements, general principles, stimulus variability, and response availability) that are relevant to training in ethics (Baldwin & Ford, 1988; Curry, 1996; Goldstein, Lopez, & Greenleaf, 1979). Salomon & Perkins (1989) condense these four transfer principles to two major areas: (1) low road transfer and (2) high road transfer.

Low Road Transfer
This type of transfer occurs via incremental learning involving varied and extensive practice that gradually extends to ever-widening situations. The learner may “overlearn” certain crucial ethical content to the extent that it is displayed almost “automatically” when cued by the appropriate ethical situation. The training and development professional may initially design the training and the transfer situations to be as similar as possible (identical elements) but gradually extend the learning and practice opportunities to include a wide variation of potential ethical situations.
Unfortunately, it would appear that most training programs rarely design training that would involve this type of approach (it is usually very difficult to get administrative support to provide the required amount of learning and practice time), even though it is essential for certain types of skills (e.g., physical restraint). Much existing training (including ethics training) appears to involve little opportunity for practice. Even when “role plays” are included in training, they are often not used for skill rehearsal by all of the participants. Learning a skill to the level of “automaticity” usually requires extensive practice time.

Other implications for ethics training based on this approach include:

1. Identify concrete ethical problem solving skills that can be practiced in the training and work environments. Practice the demonstration of ethical problem solving with real case scenarios (or as close to real as possible). Learners need the opportunity to demonstrate skills and not just discuss ethical cases.

2. Identify and practice “key” ethical skills to the level of automaticity. Some behaviors can be “overlearned” to the extent that a worker routinely employs them with little conscious effort. For example, a worker may routinely discuss a client’s rights as part of the admission procedures. A child and youth care trainer may routinely initiate training sessions by clarifying roles and responsibilities including the organization’s policy and professional standards regarding confidentiality.

3. Practice with application in mind. Make connections between the learning and doing situations. For example, ask a learner to adapt a role play to make it as similar as possible to a typical work situation. You may ask them to choose another role player that most reminds them of someone in their work situation.

4. Use instructional strategies that closely approximate the ethical assessment, decision making, and implementation process that will occur on the job. For example, a worker may rehearse in training a consultation session regarding an ethical issue with a supervisor or colleague.

5. Increase the types of ethical practice scenarios to include increasingly ever-widening situations. This may involve the use of a variety of individuals and settings that workers encounter. Since the amount of time permitted in training is limited. A practice and participant feedback plan must be developed and implemented that extends beyond the training setting.

6. Use distributed practice with gradual removal of practice. Integrate the practice into the work environment. This may involve the use of trainers and coaches in team meetings, etc. Encourage supervisors and others within the work environment to promote ethical practice through discussion and ethical problem solving in team meetings.

High Road Transfer
While low road transfer strategies encourage the learning of key skills to the level of automaticity (to the extent that a behavior occurs almost automatically, with little conscious effort), high road transfer involves very deliberate, conscious (mindful) thinking about the learning and implementation of an ethical skill. The ability to think about, monitor, and guide how one learns and applies learning on the job has been described as metacognition or meta-competence (Bernotavicz, 1994; Curry & Rybicki, 1995). Learning skills to the level of automaticity frees up the limited amount of conscious short-term memory available to an individual and potentially increases the opportunity for learners to use metacognitive skills to promote application of ethical problem solving. However, more frequently, the tendency for most individuals is that automaticity inhibits analytical reflection. Examples in everyday life include learning about culture and family. Family and cultural knowledge are usually learned so “well” (to the level of automaticity) that most of us lose conscious awareness of the powerful family and cultural norms and values that guide our day-to-day behavior. This often becomes a barrier for many professionals in their attempts to become culturally competent. This “invisible” learning can also affect how child and youth care workers deal with ethical situations. For example, Mattison (2000) describes how workers may establish deontological (adherence to ethical rules) or teleological (an emphasis on the consequences of proposed actions) value patterns when dealing with ethical problems. This kind of mindfulness is characteristic of high road transfer of learning.

High road transfer also involves the use of abstract principles (e.g., rules, labels, prototypes, schematic patterns). Transfer occurs by purposefully using general rules or principles that underlie the subject matter. A basic assumption behind the development of ethical codes is that individuals will recognize and transfer the appropriate general ethical principle to the specific situation/case in the actual practice situation. This is also the concept behind the use of ethical assessment and decision making models.

Implications for transfer of ethics learning based on the high road approach include:

1. Train underlying principles of ethical practice in child and youth care that transcend context. Help learners recognize these underlying ethical principles (mindful abstraction).

2. Train ethical assessment and decision making strategies that can be used with many different types of ethical problems.

3. Utilize parallel processing. For example, have the learners examine how the trainer-trainee, the supervisor-supervisee, the worker-youth relationship, and the parent-child relationships are similar regarding the ethical use of power.

4. Use a variety of case examples for each ethical principle to strengthen a learner’s understanding of the principles.

5. Provide examples of when an ethical principle applies and when not.

6. Help learners cognitively store ethical information with retrieval in mind. Identify situations where ethical problems are likely to occur. Help learners identify cues that will signal the worker that an ethical problem may exist.

7. Teach metacognitive skills. Help the training participants learn how to learn and apply application principles regarding ethics. Help them learn to use the ethical codes to monitor and guide their practice. For example, provide suggestions and application aides that can serve as reminders to workers on the job that a case situation may have ethical implications similar to one that was previously discussed in training.

8. Help participants plan for application of learning. Help them think about how to overcome barriers to application as well as strategies to prevent or reverse the process of backsliding into old habits.

To effectively promote the application of ethics learning in child and youth care practice settings, training and development professionals will need to incorporate both low and high road transfer approaches. In addition, interventions will need to extend beyond the “classroom” setting and involve key persons within the transfer milieu.

A Practical Model for Promoting Application of Learning on-the-job
Curry, Caplan & Knuppel (1991; 1994) describe a basic but comprehensive model that can be used to guide individual, environmental, and training design transfer interventions (including low and high road approaches) into a comprehensive transfer plan. Broad & Newstrom, (1992) and Wentz, (2002) also advocate a similar approach. They emphasize that key persons (e.g., worker, coworker, supervisor, trainer) at key times (before, during and after formal training) can help or hinder transfer effectiveness. They suggest the utilization of a transfer matrix for transfer assessment and intervention that can be applied to any training, including ethics training. Figure 1 provides a brief illustration of how the model could be applied to ethics training. Many additional before, during, and after transfer strategies that incorporate both low and high road approaches can be included to help a child and youth care training and development professional achieve one’s ethics training and transfer objectives.

The total number and strength of transfer factors in each cell promoting transfer (driving forces) and hindering transfer (restraining forces) determines the amount of transfer. The transfer matrix can be used as a template to place over any existing training program to assess factors that affect transfer and develop an effective plan for transfer intervention and evaluation by increasing transfer driving forces and decreasing transfer restraining forces. This approach involves a paradigm shift from viewing (ethics) training as an event that occurs during the training session to an intervention influenced by key individuals before, during and after training.

Conclusion
This series of articles has provided an introduction to the National Staff Development and Training Association’s Code of Ethics for Training and Development Professionals in Human Services. The importance of the child and youth care worker training and development professional in promoting ethical child and youth care practice was emphasized throughout. Conceptual models, professional responsibilities and practical strategies to promote ethical practice through training were discussed. Continued discussion and development in this area is needed.

References

Baldwin, T.T., & Ford, K.J. (1988). Transfer of training: A review and directions for future research. Personnel Psychology, 41, 63-105.

Beaudin, B.P. (1987). Enhancing the transfer of job-related learning from the learning environment to the workplace. Performance and Instruction, 26, 19-21.

Bernotavicz, F. (1994). A new paradigm for Competency-based training. Journal of Continuing Social Work Education. 6, 3-9.

Brittain, C.R. (2000). The Effect of a Supportive Organizational Environment on Transfer of Training in Child Welfare Organizations. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. University of Colorado at Denver.

Broad, M.L. & Newstrom, J.W. (1992). Transfer of Training: Action-packed Strategies to Ensure High Payoff from Training Investments. Reading, M.A.: Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

Curry, D.H. (1996) Factors Affecting the Perceived Transfer of Learning of Child Protection Social Workers. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Kent State University Graduate School of Education.

Curry, D. (2001). Evaluating transfer of learning in human services. Journal of Child and Youth Care Work, 15-16, 155-170.

Curry, D.H., Caplan, P., & Knuppel, J. (1991). Transfer of Training and Adult Learning. Paper presented at the Excellence in Training International Conference, Cornell University, 1991.

Curry, D.H., Caplan, P. & Knuppel, J. (1994). Transfer of Training and Adult Learning (TOTAL). Journal of Continuing Social Work Education, 6, 8-14.

Curry, D. & Caplan, P. (1996). The transfer field: A training exercise. The Child and Youth Care Leader. 7, 28-30.

Curry, D.H. & Rybicki, Sr. M. (1995). Assessment of Child and Youth Care Worker Trainer Competencies. Journal of Child and Youth Care Work, 10, 61-73.

Curry, D., Wentz, R., Brittain, C. and McCarragher, T. (2004). The Code of Ethics for Training and Development Professionals in Human Services:  Case Scenarios, and Training Implications. Washington, D.C.:  National Staff Development and Training Association of the American Public Human Services Association.

Goldstein, A., Lopez, M. & Greenleaf, D.O. (1979). Introduction In, Maximizing Treatment Gains: Transfer Enhancement in Psychotherapy. Goldstein, A.P. & Kanfer, F.H. eds. New York: Academic Press.

Holton, E. F., Bates, R.A., Seller, D.L., & Carvalho, M.B. (1997). Toward construct validation of a transfer climate instrument. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 8, 95-113.

Lewin, K. (1951). Field Theory in Social Science. New York: Harper and Row.

Mattison, M. (2000). Ethical decision making: The person in the process. Social Work, 45, 201-212.

Rackham, N. (1979). The coaching controversy. Training and Development Journal, 39, 12-16.

Salomon, G. & Perkins, D.N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon, Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.

Tracey, J.B., Tannenbaum, S.I., & Kavanagh, M.J. (1995). Applying trained skills on the job: The importance of the work environment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 80, 239-252.

Wells, D. & Schminke, M. (2001). Ethical development and human resources training: An integrative framework. Human Resource Management Review, 11, 135-158.

Wentz, R.M. (2002). Learning from funny and outrageous training stories. Training and Development in Human Services, 2, 34-40.