PRACTICE
Adventure boosts
empowerment
Jack Howell

dolescent rebellion is not an
inevitable phase in human development, according to psychologist Anne
Wilson Schaef. She asserts that the power struggle between generations,
which seems impossible to avoid, is a result of a patriarchal pecking
order in our society which keeps teenagers at the bottom of the chain of
command at the very time in their lives when the individuation process
and the need for autonomy are at full bore.
When we take a careful look at the
issue, it seems clear that parents — and adults in general — tend to set
both themselves and the adolescents in their life up for unnecessary
battles which, though usually beginning over a relatively insignificant
issue, can often escalate into full scale war ultimately resulting in a
domestic apocalypse. When such conflict continues to escalate without
intervention, alienated, angry, frustrated youth may run away from home,
become delinquent, turn to substance abuse, and/or require psychiatric
hospitalization.
While the failure of adults to properly
respond to their adolescents’ individuation process and autonomy needs
is only one of many factors which can lead to delinquency, substance
abuse and psychiatric disorders among adolescents, it may be the most
common — and is certainly the most preventable.
Prevention
The prevention strategy is simple: as adolescents begin to carve out
their own space in the world, the adults who have controlled, sustained,
and protected them begin to let go. In fact they do more than gradual
passive concession; they pro-actively challenge their youth to challenge
themselves. The reflex reaction of adults who are used to being in
charge is to hold on harder when their youngsters begin to push the
boundaries. This happens in part because adults, who have appropriately
kept tight reins on their children in the past, are unable to adjust
quickly enough to the rapid and often instantaneous changes as their
children pass into puberty — and become adults in process. Teenagers
sense instinctively that they are ready for a gradual increase in
freedom, autonomy and responsibility. Adults have to be hit over the
head with the same realization. Adults often tend to increase their
teenager’s responsibilities (such as adding more and more
household chores) without increasing their autonomy. When teens
defy the added expectations, parents assume they cannot handle added
autonomy, when in reality it is likely that the expectations would have
been fulfilled had added autonomy come with the package.
Once adolescents are in crisis and
require clinical and/or judicial intervention, the traditional approach
is also to hold on even harder, to break their will, to take the
fight out of them, to wear them down into compliance, using rigidly
structured behavior modification programmes. These programmes may often
appear to be effective with many youth in the short term in the
sense that they become ‘manageable’ — but at what cost to their
self-actualization? This is not to suggest that behaviourally oriented
clinical programmes don’t have their place, but rather to say that an
attempt to control inappropriate behaviour without at the same
time addressing the adolescent’s need and right to develop autonomy and
individuality is doomed to fail.
The movement to empower
There is growing momentum in the movement to empower youth as a
means of prevention and intervention. The student volunteer movement is
spreading rapidly across the country, making community service of some
sort a prerequisite for high school graduation. Progressive leaders in
youth ministry in many churches are changing the format of their
programmes from education and entertainment to inter-generational
integration and leadership training. While initial results are
non-conclusive, it would appear that when adolescents are offered
progressively more control over their lives, more input into decisions
and policies directly affecting them, more room to risk and more respect
for their evolving beliefs and ideas, they are willing and able to
accept more responsibility, achieve more academically, and contribute
more to their families and their society.
Application to child care
Assuming other factors continue to be helpful for healthy
development, it would appear that adolescent rebellion can be avoided or
minimized by offering appropriate opportunities for autonomy, individual
expression and responsibility. This strategy seems equally premising as
an intervention with youth already in crisis once other psychiatric
issues, if possible, have been addressed. Empowerment programmes such as
those used by the Eckerd Therapeutic Wilderness Camping System, for
example, serve to interrupt the cycle of adolescent acting out by
offering them the very things they have struggled so violently to
achieve. Instead of bearing down harder on residents as they struggle
harder, and instead of simply letting them go to wreak havoc upon
themselves and others, such an adventure offers a third alternative: the
opportunity to take control of their lives within an appropriate
structure. The structure serves as a wooden frame or mould might serve
when cement is being poured. As the soft, malleable character forms and
solidifies, the structure is there to offer support. Once the concrete
is firm the external supports are extraneous and are removed. Once the
programme succeeds, the structure is removed and the youth is able to
use autonomy appropriately and become a functional and productive
citizen. The structure in this case is composed of the confines and
methods of the Eckerd camping programme. By removing young people from
their homes and community environments and placing them in therapeutic
residential wilderness settings, their potential for inappropriate
behaviour is limited and the negative factors of poor family dynamics
and home-peer influences are removed. Then, rather than making the
emphasis of the programme on rules and restrictions, the focus shifts to
challenges and opportunities.
Giving responsibility
On extended wilderness trips, residents are responsible for meeting
many of their own needs. By placing them in a vulnerable position in a
safe but uncontrolled environment alien to them, and giving them the
responsibility for providing for their own comfort and safety, three
things occur. First, there is a shift in their own sense of priorities.
Other things which previously seemed important to them, issues over
which they were willing to fight to any extreme, suddenly seem quite
insignificant when their own "perceived" survival is on their own
shoulders. Then, by being challenged to care for their basic needs,
residents experience true autonomy for the first time and realize they
have been given what they had been fighting for. Yet it wasn’t by
"fighting" that they gained it, and only by co-operation and appropriate
behaviour will they keep it. Finally, because the role of staff in the
camping programme is to work side by side with the residents as
team-members (rather than direct them as authority figures) the
residents begin to learn to trust adults, and are further reinforced in
their sense of autonomy and individuality. This reinforcement by caring
adults of the adolescent’s newly-acquired sense of autonomy must not be
minimized or confused with his or her capacity of knowing" autonomy and
translating it into action. In fact, after an empowering river trip (or
any other wilderness adventure experience) residents still need help in
interpreting the meanings and implications associated with being more
fully in charge of their own lives.
Maximising experiences
The understandings that they gain solely from experiencing a ‘power
of life’ adventure are simply far from complete and mature. Two
secondary extensions help to maximize the academic and therapeutic
benefits inherent in the primary adventure:
-
drawing out from the residents the
personal earnings associated with the adventure, and
-
exposing residents to the ideas and
feelings of others who have also participated in the adventure or
who have had a related experience in the past.
Both of these secondary experiences
extend the first-hand base experience and further strengthen the
resident’s understanding of his or her own growing independence. Calling
forth and welcoming the residents’ personal response is easily achieved
by giving them individual time to talk about the experience and to
express their ideas and feelings in a variety of ways. This sharing time
allows opportunity for the resident to reorder the experience, give it
shape, and integrate it into his or her thinking. (It is necessary in
this instance to recall that when residents are unable to express their
understandings verbally, other avenues of expression must be made
available to them, e.g., art, music, drama and writing.) This added
‘sharing component’ complements the ‘experience component’ and further
empowers residents who, in the process, also extend and strengthen their
personal skills of communication (listening, speaking, writing,
reading). ‘Bathing residents’ in a wardrobe of language, ideas, and
values from others, takes them beyond themselves to places that are
concerned with persons and their capabilities
— capabilities that include being more aware of oneself, of being
concerned about things in the world, and of ultimately living more
authentically. This sense of additional empowerment is promoted as
residents have multiple opportunities to hear the ideas and thinking of
their counsellor-teachers and peer group members. Through their
reactions and responses to one anothers’ ideas, a new dynamic for
teaching emerges. Learning is transformed and individual "knowing" is
expanded as each group member pays attention to what the other has to
say. By comparing and contrasting the variation of personal ideas
associated with the primary adventure, residents retrieve alternative
thoughts about success, recognition and importance, and are exposed to
healthy interpretations of power and control. In the process of sharing
with one another, residents are influenced as they continue to
re-create, clarify, and expand their own personal perspectives. This
additional opportunity for reflection represents a vital link to
meaning. It is achieved by a two-way process of address and response to
what the individual residents and supporting adults have to say about
responsibility vs. irresponsibility, about dominance vs. submission,
about dependence vs. independence, and, ultimately, about the power of
love and compassion. These additional perspectives serve as springboards
for ever widening knowledge and give residents options as they try them
out in the course of real life challenges and human interactions.
Adventure programmes
The Eckerd camping system pays attention to adolescents’ desire and
need for greater independence and responsibility. It recognizes that
they demand to be treated as adults and that they want and need control
over significant portions of their lives. This gaining of independence
is, therefore, central in planning for the residents’ needs. We
believe that there is no easy substitute for primary wilderness
experiences (ones that do not require reading and writing to be
successful) for providing the raw material or launching pad for
empowering young people. These experiences refresh and heighten
their consciousness so they really see the things they look at
and hear the things they listen to, in interaction with
environments rather than in detachment from them. We also believe that
caring adults and peers must be readily available to residents so that
sharing of experience is facilitated. We recognize that exercises and
workbooks are poor substitutes for the "acts" of listening, speaking,
singing, dancing, and writing out of experience and within real
communication settings. When these efforts are further supported by
bringing residents into contact with the wide range of literature that
is available, residents discover new dimensions of self hood and confirm
and extend existence in relationship to others.
Adult leaders
Pro-actively empowering adolescents in these ways requires adult
leaders within the camping system who are sensitive to developmental
needs and individual differences among residents, and it entails
providing structure when needed, and decreasing structure when it
stifles growth. Empowering young people in the "Eckerd Way" involves
both caring adults and peers encouraging one another to open
environments that open the world. It involves working and talking
together, so that experiences and words are exchanged, for it is
experience and shared words that are integral and indispensable parts of
the process of teaching fuller understanding. It is in sharing that the
door is open and the resident discovers new dimensions of his or her own
emerging independent selfhood, and is simultaneously awakened to a sense
of interdependence with others.
How significant it seems then to
recognize that the individual adolescent has something to contribute!
What an opportunity exists for the resident in the dialogue with peers!
How encouraging and powerful when counsellor-teachers are deeply
acquainted with residents and committed to creating conditions and
experiences for them that foster human interaction, personal
accountability, and boosts of empowerment!
References
Loughmiller, C. (1965). Wilderness Road. Austin: Hogg Foundation
for Mental Health.
Schaef, A.W. (1987). When society becomes an addict. Cambridge:
Harper and Row.
Schorr, L.B. (1988). Within our reach: Breaking the cycle of
disadvantage. New York: Doubleday.
Acknowledgements to the Journal of Emotional and Behavioural Problems
Vol.1 No.3
This
feature: Howell, J. (1992). Adventure boosts empowerment.
Reclaiming Children and Youth.
Vol. 1 No.3
______
|