|
HOME / CYC-ONLINE
READING FOR CHILD
AND YOUTH CARE WORKERS
ISSUE 29 • JUNE 2001
CHILDREN'S RIGHTS
André Viviers gave a
paper at the Nuffield Free State Faculty of Law Conference on Human
Rights on 11 April 2001

The
Implementation and Enforcement of Human Rights
I want to start with a
quote from Daniel Goleman:
"It is the paradox
of our time that those with power are too comfortable to notice the
pain of those who suffer, and those who suffer have no power".
Though my focus will be on
the enforcement of children’s rights in South Africa, certain aspects
may just as well apply to all people in South Africa. I am also going to
try to focus rather on some practical matters, rather than purely on the
theory that underpins the enforcement of human rights.
The basis of human rights in our country, and thus also children’s
rights, is laid down in the South African Constitution, which is
complemented by other international treaties on child rights which the
SA Government has ratified, such as the United Nations Convention on
the Rights of the Child and the OAU Charter on the Rights and
Welfare of the African Child.
An Approach to the
Implementation of Child Rights
To start, I would like to
add to the many existing definitions, a simplistic description that
human rights are generally those basic standards without which people
cannot live in dignity.
It should also be understood
that all human rights apply equally to children as they do to adults,
but that additional rights are afforded to children through the above
conventions and various other international instruments.
We understand that the State
has the legal and moral obligation and accountability with regard to the
meeting of basic needs of its people and the upholding of their rights.
In other words, the state is the primary duty bearer in the
implementation of rights. The state has a duty to act in the best
interest of children when allocating resources available in society, no
matter how small the amounts. More, children are subjects of rights or
rights holders and not objects of charity. Such a view facilitates the
process whereby children, within the context of their evolving
capacities, participate in matters and decisions that concern them and
affect their lives.
One of the first steps in
implementing rights is to create an awareness of rights and how
they apply to each individual in a country. This is usually achieved
through information and awareness campaigns which are important tools in
making sure that all citizens know and understand their rights.
This coincides with the
processes of capacity building and training to ensure that the
duty bearers understand how rights apply and should be safeguarded. We
need to create and increase the capacity of duty bearers to integrate a
human rights based approach in their daily work. This component is often
much neglected, and the idea that this capacity in people will be
learned through "osmosis" is not working, and we thus failing
rights holders in a democratic society. Capacity building of duty
bearers should not only include the transfer of knowledge and skill, but
should also, and most prominently, focus on the development of attitudes
towards a human rights/child rights culture.
Advocacy
is another component of human rights implementation and usually focuses
on specific issues, for example the current strong lobby on the
availability of antiviral drugs for the prevention of HIV transmission
of mothers to children during birth.
The monitoring of the
implementation of rights is critical. This needs to happen
internally, e.g. when government assesses its own progress in
implementing rights. Understandably, this kind of monitoring is
subjective and usually focus on what has been achieved, rather than on
what has not been achieved. External monitoring, done by NGO’s as well
as the international community such as the United Nations and the OAU,
complements this.
Responding to violations of
the rights of children is central
in the process of enforcement of rights – remembering that not
informing people of their rights is as serious as a blatant violation of
rights.
For all
It is critical that the
state works towards the implementation of the rights of children in a
manner that makes a difference to every child. A child in the most
remote rural village should experience that he/she is a right holder.
This means going beyond the state merely ratifying international
treaties and developing legislation, and being responsible for putting
resources in place that will ensure the implementation of the rights of
children.
It is relatively easy for
the government to implement Civil and Political Rights (so-called ‘first
generation rights’) where there are, in principle, no additional costs
beyond changing laws and approaches to ensure that the rights themselves
are respected, for example, in non-discrimination, criminal justice,
participation, etc. The blockage seems to be with the implementation or
progressive realisation of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(so-called ‘second generation’) rights, as the implementaton of
these will inevitably have associated costs, for example, health,
housing and education rights.
In terms of the latter, it
is important that the government ratifies the Convenant of Social,
Economic and Cultural Rights as this gives an obligatory effect
towards the progressive realisation of rights contained in conventions
ratified by a country, particularly socio-economic rights, which require
resources for implementation. There are also guidelines and principles
in place such as the Limburg Principles (1986) and the Maastricht
Guidelines on the Violations of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights
(1997), which provide direction to state parties in obligations towards
the progressive realisation of human rights. Thus, deliberate and direct
efforts are required from states parties to direct resources towards the
realisation of rights.
The South African
Constitution sets out certain institutions that should be created
for the support of Constitutional Democracy, which include:
- The Public protector
- The Human Rights Commission
- The Commission for the Promotion and
Protection of the Rights of Cultural, Religious and Linguistic
Communities.
- The Commission on Gender Equality
- The Auditor General
- The Electoral Commission
- The Independent Authority to Regulate
Broadcasting
In addition, the Independent
Complaints Directorate, Office on the Status of Disabled Persons,
and Office on the Rights of the Child have also been introduced
in the governance structures.
Responding to violations
As I have indicated earlier,
responding to violations of rights is an important aspect in the
enforcement of rights. The structure best known to us in dealing with
this as part of their duties, is the SA Human Rights Commission. I
want to salute this Commission for the work that they have done thus far
and their vivid attempts and actions towards the protection of rights,
as well as for setting up a focal point for children within the
commission. I am, however, concerned that such a body remains, in my
opinion, grossly under resourced, so that they are not able (as they
would have liked) to respond to all rights violations.
Through involvement in the
child rights arena I have seen that effective mechanisms for responding
to and monitoring rights violations are limited. A situation is created
where children have rights, but when these are violated, very little, if
anything, can be done about it. In most cases it is the NGOs and legal
institutes at academic institutions that take the lead in such cases,
and their contribution has been extremely valuable.
Conclusion
My concern is that, if we
cannot adequately and appropriately respond to the violation of rights,
we are limited in our enforcement of rights. This creates the
impression amongst rights holders that violations are not taken
seriously and are not responded to.
This requires of all of us
who are serious about the implementation of rights, that we work in our
daily practice towards a position where all people, and not only the
privileged few, benefit from having rights. We should work towards
building mechanisms and networks to promote and monitor implementation
and to respond to rights violations. This is part of our culture of
accountability -- both of civil society, and of the state which has its
own particular obligations as a rights duty bearer.
 ______
|