Core values and principles of a training and
development professional
Dale Curry
This is the second of a series of articles focusing on
ethics in child and youth care worker training and development. The first
article (see here) provided
an introduction to the National Staff Development and Training Association's
Code of Ethics for Training and Development Professionals. The full document
can be retrieved from the NSDTA website (http://nsdta.aphsa.org). The first
two Core Values and Principles were introduced in the first article (1)
Beneficence and Non-Maleficence and (2) Learning, Development,
Self-Awareness, and Self-Actualization. The remaining four Core Values and
Principles will be discussed in this article. These values and principles
emphasize the importance of providing leadership through training and
development activities, promoting cultural competence and self
determination, and maintaining a high level of integrity regarding
professional responsibilities. The Core Values and Principles will be listed
followed by an example of compliance and non-compliance to each value and
principle
. The examples are intended to promote understanding of the
values, principles, and standards. However, they are not intended to be
absolute. Although the examples in this article do not specifically mention
child and youth care worker trainers, the implications are very relevant to
child and youth care worker training and development activities.
Inherent within the work of the both child and youth care
practitioners and those who promote their training and development are two
central concepts: care and control. Developing caring relationships and valuing
people are balanced with providing the right amount of control
(structure/influence/authority) to promote change and development. So that care
and concern for people take priority over control and other personal interests,
training and development practitioners must be aware of the profession's core
values and guiding ethical principles.
Human Service Leadership
Training and development professionals recognize the importance of providing
leadership in human services through training and development activities.
Training and development professionals also recognize their potential influence
and take responsibility for their activities in promoting service to others.
Compliance Example – A training and development
researcher who explored factors affecting the transfer of learning of
employment counselors presented her results at a conference attended by
state and federal policy-makers. One week after her presentation, she mailed
the participants a “user friendly” pamphlet that clearly indicated potential
policy changes based on her research that could improve transfer of learning
of employment counselors resulting in better services to the unemployed. The
researcher enclosed her business card along with an offer of additional
assistance if requested.
Noncompliance Example – Several workshop participants
in elder care training complained to the trainer and other participants that
the “administration” was not concerned about the care of the elderly. Even
though a few of the other workshop participants indicated that some of the
complaints were not entirely accurate, the trainer permitted the
participants to “vent” during the training for 20 minutes. The trainer
finally redirected the discussion back to the scheduled training by
sympathizing with the “complainers” stating “it’s too bad that there is
nothing I can do, I just do the training. We better get to the next section
so that we will have time for a break.”
Individual Uniqueness, Cultural Diversity and Competence
Training and development professionals value diversity in our society and
promote worker competence in understanding the uniqueness of individuals within
their environments.
Compliance Example – A curriculum designer integrated
examples of diversity into every section of a newly created curriculum on
discipline and behavior management. The designer also included suggestions
for the trainer regarding how to explore and help participants better
appreciate diversity among the training group.
Noncompliance Example – Under the constraints of a
tight production timeline and small budget, an instructional media
specialist produced a computer-displayed presentation that included video
and still pictures primarily comprised of her relatively homogeneous family
members, friends, and neighbors. The computer-displayed presentation was
incorporated into a standardized training package and presented to all
juvenile justice workers in the state.
Self-Determination
Training and development professionals respect the right of the learner to
determine what, when, and how it is best for that individual to learn. A variety
of instructional strategies should be considered to encourage participation from
learners with different learning styles. Even “mandatory” training activities
(e.g., training content required by law or administrative rule) should provide
the learner with options of how to participate. In addition, training and
development professionals should advocate through their practice the importance
of self-determination for those who receive and/or are in need of human
services.
Compliance Example – A trainer of victim’s assistance
training on domestic violence stated before the training and several times
during the training that the subject matter can be emotionally intense at
times. She added that participants should feel free to not participate if
the subject matter becomes overly intense for them individually.
Participants may choose to close their eyes or leave the room and get a
drink of water.
Non-compliance example – Since separation and loss
are crucial knowledge areas in child welfare, a child protective services
trainer insisted that everyone participate in a guided visualization dealing
with loss. The trainer was unaware that one participant had just returned to
work after attending the funeral of a close relative.
Integrity
Training and development professionals promote a climate of trust and mutual
respect. Values and standards from the NSDTA Code are integrated into training
and development activities. Working relationships are clarified with others
regarding the areas of competence of the training and development professional,
program goals, methods, content/curricula, confidentiality, fees, and
assessment/evaluation strategies. Agreed-upon
commitments are adhered to by the training and development professional.
Compliance Example – In order to promote appropriate
risk-taking for learning, the trainer informed participants that she will
not ordinarily discuss with the participants’ supervisors the individual
participant discussions during the training. However, the trainer added that
under certain circumstances, she may be ethically obligated to inform the
supervisor (e.g., if she has concerns that clients will be harmed). She
states that in the few situations when this has happened in the past, she
informed the participant of her intent to talk with the supervisor. The
day after training one of the participant’s supervisors called the trainer
saying that she heard there were some complaints during the training and
demanded to know what her worker “complained” about The trainer declined to
comment on any of the participant’s discussions and referred the supervisor
to the agency’s policy on training and communication with supervisors and
other supportive personnel.
Noncompliance Example – Thinking that she may receive
a higher evaluation rating from the training participants, a trainer ends
training 45 minutes earlier than scheduled even though she had not completed
training to all of the learning objectives.
Ethical Dilemmas
While thinking about the above values, principles and examples, the reader
may be experiencing some ambivalence and internal conflict regarding some of the
implications of these values and principles. For example, how does a training
and development professional protect the rights of the children for competent
care while also promoting the self determination of the learner by permitting
the learner to determine what, when, and how it is best for that individual
to learn? If a worker refuses to demonstrate a crucial crisis management
skill in training, what ethical obligation does the trainer have to the client
or the supervisor of the learner to ensure learner competence? Some ethical
situations are more complex than simply choosing the alternative that adheres to
an ethical principle. Often a child and youth care training and development
professional will have to choose among alternatives that involve more than one
ethical principle. These ethical dilemmas have been described as situations
where a person encounters (1) a choice between two rationally defensible courses
of action, (2) actions supported by one or more ethical principles or
responsibilities, and (3) actions having potential significant consequences.
They normally involve choices among conflicting values or responsibilities
(Harding, 1985; Mallucio, Pine, & Tracy, 2002). Further discussion regarding
ethical dilemmas and how to approach them will be discussed in a subsequent
article.
References
Harding, C.G. (1985). Moral Dilemmas. Chicago:
Precedent Publishing.
Malucio, A.N., Pine, B.A., & Tracy, E.M. (2002). Social
Work Practice with Families and Children. N.Y.: Columbia University Press.
National Staff Development and Training Association (2004).
The Code of Ethics for Training and Development Professionals in Human
Services: Case Scenarios, and Training Implications. Washington, D.C.:
National Staff Development and Training Association of the American Public Human
Services Association.