Gloria Lithuli from the Inanda Family Preservation project near Durban reminds us that a strengths-based approach is reflected in our practice not only by what we do but also by what we write.
Strengths-based Recording In principle, our recording, as much as our on-line actions, should reflect on the strengths of the children, young people and families. Most often strengths are not captured in our reports and upon reading the report one is often confronted with the negative labels which usually end up shaping our thinking. In our work we focus more on strengths because we want to build on what is good and positive for the people. If we do assess and use strengths, then we should be able to reflect them in our recording. What does this mean practically? Highlight as many positives as you can You must identify things that are working well with the family. Things you may have picked up during the referral (even before you have met the family or young person) or things that you may have observed during your early contacts with the family. The following example is an illustration of how you can identify some strengths in any family even before contact is initiated.
If there is a need to reflect on any weakness to make a certain point, we should be able to balance that with strengths. For instance:
You will find that enhancing such strengths in your recording is less exhausting than being trapped in focusing on what is not good about the family. Look for potential It is essential to observe the family’s capacity to learn new ways of doing things. Check who is making an effort to learn, is there any enthusiasm demonstrated? An example of this would be:
Furthermore you should also look out for any potential for change or growth that you might be able to capitalise on, for example:
Pay attention to cultural richness We all know that there are plenty of strengths to be found in people’s cultures. All we need to do is to identify those cultural practices and connections that bring family members together and strengthen them despite their current disagreements or crisis situations. Here is an example:
No negative labelling We should record in a manner that minimises blame, as this is connected to negative labeling. Our report should be devoid of negative and demeaning labels such as ‘aggressive’, ‘hostile’, ‘uncooperative’,‘ resistant, ‘unmotivated’, etc. Remember that any particular label might mean something different to others who might be reading the report, and it transmits very little helpful information about the actual situation. Such labeling could even be misleading. The specific things that the child or the young person or any other family member did to result in those labels could possibly be far less scary than the label might imply. So instead of using value-laden terms like ‘resistant’, it is more helpful to describe as ‘lacking some of the necessary skills to begin thinking about the issues at hand.’ One could describe a person as ‘feeling helpless’ instead of ‘unmotivated’. Search for potential resources Find out what existing resources there are within the family to draw on. You need to find out whether there are any influential extended family members, neighbours or special friends who could supplement and strengthen the family’s support system. This could be reflected in the report like this:
Remember skills talents and abilities Recording should also portray the family members’ dreams, their exceptional qualities and things that they are good at. In our involvement with families, we obviously create opportunities where certain members are exposed to experiences of growth, e.g. workshops and skills training. Which family members acquire skills or display talents? All of these need to be reflected in our report. An example:
|
|
|