PRACTICE
Anne Barends and Eric Harper, when child care
workers at Oranjia Children's Home in Cape Town, wrote on the central role
of play and recreation — and how to get there
Relationships and Play
Child care work is intense, disturbing, often unrewarding,
and has a high staff burn-out rate. It involves child care workers in having
to discover resources (new or old facets of themselves), which they do not
always know are there, so as to meet the ever-new complexities encountered.
The child care worker has to learn sometimes to act contrary to her
instinctive or automatic reactions, and at other times to know that her gut
feeling is her best guide. She has to admit that there are times when she
does not know what to often does not have a specialised professional
training with which to enter the job. What theory is known, is not always in
harmony with practical day-to-day implementation in the practice setting.
The hours of work and pay in relation to normal work expectations are
somewhat contentious issues. Despite all this, the child care service
continues to render a creditable service. How is this possible? In this
article the authors attempt to identify, from a child care worker's point of
view, the factors which we believe help to explain this paradox. The two
related factors we wish to discuss are relationships and play.
Therapeutic Milieu
The therapeutic milieu conceptualised by such writers as Maxwell Jones
and Bruno Bettelheim has provided a much-needed practice framework for child
care. It is a structure and support system for both the child and the child
care team. The therapeutic milieu provides the child with a space in which
to 'act out' the torment, frustration and tensions which besiege his life, a
space with safe and containing limits. The child care worker, to make the
environment work for both her and the child, helps the child to follow the
general routines of the programme, as well as the child's specific
individualised programme. This caring/therapeutic environment allows for a
natural healing process for the child. However, Whittaker points out that
one of the key problems faced by all child care workers is that of moving
children through routines and activities of the day. If the child care
worker depends solely on his 'authority' to move the children through
structures of the day, he soon finds himself making 'issues' over fairly
simple rules and getting into power struggles. So if the environment does
not "work" for the child, it becomes an added obstacle in his
life, and his resources and supports break down again. There are many
dishonest and destructive roles and ploys the child care worker can be
tempted to use to make the routine (which now becomes a closed system) work
- for example, those of buddy-buddy, manipulator, seducer, authoritarian,
saviour, etc. Furthermore there are the added dangers of inappropriate
'caring', for example, getting hooked into the child's need and pathology;
the pulling off of scabs whilst destructively trying to open up the child;
the attempt to give the child all the love he believes is owed to him to
compensate for his hurt or loss. Two more problem areas of the therapeutic
milieu deserve mention. First, whilst in symbolic form the therapeutic
milieu is a 'therapeutic control', in practice the child care worker does
not always have the protection of a controlled and structured therapeutic
session, i.e. fixed consultation time, place and duration. Second, the vital
support from the team helps, but at the end of the day (usually late at
night!) the child care worker is alone on the floor with the child and has
to make decisions which she hopes will be the best for the child and the
situation, and then has to accept the responsibility for those decisions.
The Relationship
The relationship between child and child care worker is the medium which
will either ensure the success or result in the failure of the therapeutic
environment. The initial building of this relationship, which will form the
ground plan for all later encounters between child and care worker, is the
starting point. Remember when embarking upon such a task, the new
relationship is the child's prerogative. Only he knows what his life history
means to him. Whilst the care worker may believe she is embarking on a new
relationship, for the child it may mean something quite different. The child
feels different, he has ambivalent feelings about himself and everything
around him, and the environment he now finds himself in, can be an
ambiguous, dismembered place lacking familiarity. So it is that underlying
any attempt at contact (relationship building) is the child's attempt and
need to find a safe space. The place to start a relationship is the place
where the child feels safe. If play and spontaneity are part of this initial
contact, then the first contact area is a safe area. However, whilst it is
at times apparently easy to assume a relationship in this manner,
particularly with a very needy child, the following should be kept in mind:
- Do not rush into a relationship;
- An initial period of thorough
observation is needed;
- It is upon the small details and events that the
relationship is built;
- Allow the child to set the tempo;
- Beware of
inappropriate relating;
- Avoid over-verbalisation in the initial period;
instead allow for subtle non-verbal cues (e.g. eye contact) to act as
indicators;
- Respect the child's privacy;
- Respect the child's
vulnerability, particularly once he has opened himself up.
Trust
The relationship must be based on trust, and the building of trust takes
time. What does trust mean? It means to open yourself to your experience
with the child, and to what he experiences. The child cannot easily
understand how you are able to care, when the more important people in his
life have let him down. To accept this care from a less significant other
(the child care worker) means to recognise and attempt to accept the lack of
care received from the most important other (the parent). Symbolically
verbalised by the child, this could be "Why should you care, when you
have your own children?" With many deprived youngsters, the challenge
of a new relationship recalls anxiety associated with the most fundamental
of all developmental tasks. Erikson (1972, 241) states that the achievement
of basic trust in the infant "forms the basis in the child for a sense
of identity which will later combine a sense of being "all right",
of being oneself, and of becoming what other people trust one will
become". He goes on to say that in certain cases the
"re-establishment of a state of trust has been found to be the basic
requirement for therapy".
It is at this point, when he opens himself to
your care, that a relationship with a child can be said to exist. Now arises
the question as to what form one can expect the relationship to take, and
this depends on what the child brings into the relationship. Remember it is
primarily his relationship, not yours. It is an authentic relationship, but
it is a relationship for him, not for the child care worker, who is
expected at this stage sensitively to receive, understand, contain and
translate what ever the child brings to it. The time period is also totally
random. It is within this phase that the child relives his past (regresses)
and develops new and healthier perceptions of it which allow him to be
himself without playing out some role. Said one child: "I tried so hard
to be what I ought, that I forgot who I am". Another: "Now that I
know what I don't want, I am beginning to know what I do want". The
care worker is involved in a diversity of roles and it is here that her
expertise and experience count, for few guidelines can be offered. Perhaps
these boil down to only one: "Does it feel right?" Some
contentious issues arise, such as socialising with the child, or opening up
to the child, and these depend on the relationship. Remember each
relationship is unique, and while at one level it may be an artificial,
constructed relationship (and necessarily so), on another level it is very
ordinary and human, subject to normal everyday experiences. In balancing
these contrary views of the relationship, the important meeting ground is
mutual respect. If the child has not come to respect himself and to respect
you, then you have not yet succeeded. Your primary role is to teach the
child how to live. Care worker and child are equal within this relationship,
neither is better or worse, they just have different life experiences. Your
role is not to manipulate the child into what you consider a healthy
position, but rather to disengage his manipulations so that the end result
is mutual respect between two human beings. This becomes a position from
which other healthy relationships can grow.
To sum up, this stage of
relationship-building is the trying period, the time you re-teach the child
to cope with day-today events. However, any learning task, at the best of
times, still has elements of frustration, and demands self-discipline. So it
is that inevitably, in attempting to teach the child behaviours and the
consequences of his behaviour, confrontation takes place. It is at this
point that the courage of real caring is called for: "I care enough to
fight you". As with all relationships, there is an end, a termination,
goodbye, departure. Depending on how this is handled, whether carefully
worked towards or occurring abruptly and unexpectedly, different emotions
will be evoked. The child is confronted with what the relationship has meant
to him, his feelings of loss, his anxiety about "going it alone"
into the next stages of his life — its tasks and further relationships. It
can be a sad and difficult time and, if not carefully handled, much of the
work which has transpired can be undone. Furthermore, the care worker also
has to work through her own losses.
Play
"A function of the ego is an attempt to synchronise the bodily and
the social process with the self." (Erikson, 1972, 190) Play is a safe
expression of the 'inner' in a non-serious or fun way while interacting with
the outer. The outer represents reality with all of its opportunities and
its unavoidable limits. The possibilities, together with their counterposed
limits, become an important opportunity for learning. Play enables the child
to master anxiety. In play the child grows as a result of those experiences
which help him to develop new ego resources (coping strategies). "Just
as the personalities of adults develop through their experience in living,
so do those of children develop through their own play. By enriching
themselves children gradually enlarge their capacity to see the richness of
the external real world. Play is the continuous evidence of creativity which
means "aliveness" (Winnicott, 1968, 144) Play develops
peer-relating skills, mastery of relationships, mastery of other skills,
release of aggression, the art of sublimation, for example, in artistic
expression. However, many children do not know how to play. They cannot
entertain themselves or even be left to their own devices. Alone, their own
histories and anxieties tend to preoccupy or immobilise them.
While most
children have the spontaneity and insight to seize the moment to initiate
play, others need help to do this, and this is where, in residential work
with children, their own sake can be sterile and unhelpful. Ideally, an
activity should attempt to meet each child's ego development level or be
geared towards repairing ego damage. We often need literally to recreate
trust and confidence, awareness and spontaneity or to build a foundation of
positive and affirming experiences, and these are the goals of a recreation
programme.
The Nature of a Recreation Programme
Many youngsters involve themselves in extra-mural activities, which
suggests a positive development of ego resources. But for others, their free
hours are often aimless and unfilled. We should be aware, when this is
developmentally inappropriate, of those who sleep away the afternoon, who
sit with glazed eyes before the TV screen, who are loners. This is not to
say that the child care worker should watch a child's every move, and it is
appreciated that blank hours exist in everybody's life, but a recreation
programme offers a possible option for the child who cannot motivate his own
recreation or play activity. Freud spoke of psychotherapy as the
"talking cure". It is particularly at the point where words are
difficult, or are no longer able to express and disguise, that the need for
play and activity emerges. In play, hidden feelings can be explored safely,
tentative ideas tested, connections made, meanings rediscovered. For the
troubled child, this is the language of play. Some practical formats for
play and recreation are offered:
- Afternoon "outside" play can
begin with fun activities with children, appropriate to their cognitive
level. The children who can be engaged in this actively are often those who
have a low level of mastery or competence. They are the institutionalised
children who do not engage spontaneously in outside activities. These games
should have elements of immediate gratification or else they will be
sabotaged. This level of play is play for its own sake, with the emphasis
being on intrinsic enjoyment rather than on any attempt to serve treatment
goals. Because of anxiety or suspicion, and low levels of frustration
tolerance, one should avoid at this stage undue rules, with limits being
confined to those relating to personal safety. For example, games in which
players are "out" or excluded for a time can be threatening or
experienced as rejecting. From here they can move profitably into more
formal games, e.g. a game of soccer or a swimming race. (A fitness drive is
particularly useful amongst adolescents for it not only focuses a lot of
physical energy, but also appeals to their self-concept.)
- Afternoon
"inside" play presents some more difficulties where more control
may be necessary. The child outside has more room for expression, but inside
can feel enclosed. These activities are more taxing on the care worker and
require greater supervision and assistance, but are valuable as the child
learns the inner controls of scaling his activities down appropriate to the
room size.
- Outings are powerful opportunities in which points of interest
in the environment can open the child to exchange and dialogue. It is here
that the over-used words "learn how to entertain yourself" apply.
Many children remain oblivious to their surroundings, the sea and mountains,
and prefer to go home to watch videos. The child in this environment is
confronted with the need for active reception as opposed to passive
reception. Few deprived children have the resources to appreciate the beauty
which surrounds them. We have a great opportunity to share words and values
with children when together we explore the wider world. Outings to social,
cultural and civic events provide yet more complex learning experiences.
- Activities with other groups. It is valuable to establish contacts for
children outside of their own religious or cultural groups. Activities with
other children's homes are useful in this regard, e.g. sporting or social
events.
Summary
"In reality everything depends on the man and little or nothing on
the method. The method is merely the path taken by man, the way he acts is
the true expression of his nature" (C.G. Jung). We have explored two
common child care themes. The human relationships we establish with children
must paradoxically be real and authentic while at the same time they may be
instrumental and contrived, yet they are in a very real sense the tools of
our craft and therefore something child care workers must understand and
"do" well. But relationships are not made of vague and vacuous
interpersonal chemistry: they must have content, and so we have introduced a
discussion on play and activities which are methods by which relationships
can be made to "work" in assisting children over developmental
logjams towards positive growth.
Bibliography Erikson, E. Childhood and Society,
Penguin Books, Harmondsworth, 1972.
Whittaker, J. Caring for Troubled Children, Jossey-Bass, San
Francisco, 1980.
Winnicott, D.W. The Child, the Family, and the Outside World, Penguin
Books, Harmondsworth, 1968.
|
|